Home Blog CWB:Bridging the Cognitive Divide Between Government and Public
Blog

CWB:Bridging the Cognitive Divide Between Government and Public

Share

By Editorial Team of Communication Without BordersCWB

Since the publication of the first article on February 14, 2025, Communication Without Borders has been focused on improving cognitive literacy, with bridging the cognitive gap between the government and the people being one of our core objectives. We deeply recognize the crucial role that class thinking plays in social governance. In reality, many people, whether consciously or unconsciously, classify themselves into either the ruling class or the governed class, and base their thinking and actions on this cognitive framework. This solidified thinking has become a major hidden danger to social stability and development.

The Solidification of Class Thinking: Cognitive Misunderstandings Between the Ruling and the Governed Classes

The misunderstandings between the ruling and governed classes manifest in several areas:

  1. Misunderstanding of Power Structure
    The ruling class often believes that their status and decisions are the guarantee of social order and stability. This mindset causes them to overlook the real needs and emotional appeals of the public. On the other hand, the governed class believes that the ruling class, through power, has deprived them of their rights, controlling resources, opportunities, and information, thus exacerbating social inequality and class division. This cognitive bias makes dialogue and understanding between the two groups extremely difficult.
  2. Different Interpretations of “Social Order” and “Inequality”
    The ruling class generally believes that social order is achieved through structured management and control, and that this order is crucial to social development. Ordinary citizens, however, often see this order as a systematized expression of inequality, believing that it allows a privileged few to monopolize power, resources, and information, depriving them of equal opportunities. These differing understandings of social order intensify societal conflicts.
  3. Misunderstanding of “Citizen Rights” and “Social Responsibility”
    The ruling class places more emphasis on social responsibility, believing that the public should act according to social rules and frameworks. However, the public is more concerned with their citizen rights, particularly the right to know, the right to participate, and the right to express. This cognitive gap deepens the divide in their positions on policies, social systems, and public affairs, further increasing the gap between social classes.

Breaking the Shackles of Class Thinking: The Power of Cognitive Literacy

Communication Without Borders is committed to breaking the shackles of class thinking, especially the cognitive misunderstandings between the ruling and governed classes. We believe that cognitive literacy is the key to helping individuals and groups break free from their inherent class cognition and cross class barriers. By enhancing critical thinking, open-mindedness, and cross-cultural understanding, both the public and elites can better understand each other’s perspectives, dissolving misunderstandings and prejudices.

The direction of Communication Without Borders’ work includes:

  1. Promoting Information Flow and Transparency
    We advocate for the free flow of information and government decision-making transparency. We hope to narrow the cognitive gap between the government and the people through open information platforms, allowing the general public to fully understand policy backgrounds and eliminating the misunderstandings and mistrust caused by information asymmetry.
  2. Facilitating Cross-Class Dialogue and Understanding
    We encourage dialogue and communication between different classes, including between the ruling and governed classes. Through face-to-face or written discussions, we aim to help different social classes understand each other’s difficulties and needs, thus promoting cognitive integration and social reconciliation.
  3. Strengthening Critical Thinking and Information Filtering Skills
    In the age of information overload, we emphasize the importance of critical thinking. Through education and practice, we help the public identify the viewpoints and biases in information, enabling them to make rational, comprehensive judgments in a complex society.

Conclusion: Cognitive Awakening, Breaking Class Boundaries

One of the core goals of Communication Without Borders is to bridge the cognitive gap between the government and the people by promoting cognitive literacy and breaking the shackles of class thinking in society. We hope that through continuous education and advocacy, we can help individuals and groups transcend their inherent cognitive frameworks, reexamine their social roles, eliminate misunderstandings and conflicts between classes, and ultimately build a more harmonious and fair society.

When both the ruling and governed classes can transcend their entrenched class thinking, cross class and cultural boundaries, and collectively understand the complexity of social issues, society will move towards a more inclusive, understanding, and cooperative direction. We believe that cognitive awakening is not only essential for individual literacy improvement but is also a key force in driving social progress and world peace.

Please follow and like us:
Related Articles

德才兼备者,往往难容于组织/ Excellence Breeds Exile

文/石敢当 (By Shi Gandang) 如果你这个人能力强,人品好,三观又正,那么恭喜你,在组织里,你基本上混不好。 这是中文社交媒体上的一名言,让无数网民点头称是。 If you are highly capable, of...

毕研韬教授受聘为察哈尔学会高级研究员

文/唐摩崖  近日,海南大学国际传播与艺术学院教授、《无界传播》总编辑毕研韬受聘为察哈尔学会高级研究员。 察哈尔学会是我国非官方、行动型的外交与国际关系领域重要智库,由时任全国政协外事委员会副主任韩方明博士于2009年10月发起创建,总部设在河北省尚义县察哈尔牧场。学会在北京、上海、柬埔寨金边、毛里求斯路易港等地设有12个办公室,并与韩国延世大学、澳门城市大学合作在当地建有研究中心。 据学会官网介绍,“察哈尔学会致力于冲突与和解事务的研究与解决,在朝鲜半岛事务、宗教外交、人权与涉藏外交等领域拥有重要的高层决策影响力”。 毕研韬教授是中国知名国际传播专家,研究领域涵盖认知管理、跨文明对话、 舆情与危机管理。今年2月,他牵头创建传播学国际实验平台《无界传播》,旨在提升公众认知素养,促进社会和解与世界和平。 Please follow and like us:

穆斯林旅游市场:为何成了全球争夺的新蓝海?

在全球旅游版图上,穆斯林市场成了新蓝海。 文/毕研韬 无论是阿联酋的奢华购物季,马来西亚的清真度假村,日本和韩国的清真餐厅,还是香港、台湾推出的穆斯林友好措施,都表明各国(地区)正在加快布局这一细分市场。那么,这个市场缘何成为全球争夺的新蓝海? 一、庞大的消费规模与增长潜力 根据迪拜伊斯兰经济发展中心与 Dinar Standard 发布的《全球伊斯兰经济状况报告》(SGIE),2022 年全球伊斯兰经济总体消费约为 2.29 万亿美元,涵盖食品、时尚、媒体、旅游等多个领域。其中,旅游板块在全球非必需消费中占据重要位置。 Mastercard–CrescentRating...

为什么产生“伊斯兰恐惧”?

“伊斯兰恐惧”不仅是对穆斯林的情绪化排斥,更是一种结构性、制度化、跨文化传播的社会现象。 文/毕研韬 要理解伊斯兰恐惧(Islamophobia)的成因,需要置于宏观历史结构、中观制度话语、微观心理互动的多层框架中考察,这样才能看到各层如何相互作用并共同塑造这一情绪与观念。 一、宏观层:历史与结构性根源 二、中观层:制度与话语的放大机制 三、微观层:心理与社会互动机制 三、结语 “伊斯兰恐惧”并非单一原因驱动的情绪,而是历史遗产、制度机制与心理认知多层次因素作用的结果。宏观层的结构性条件为它奠定了深厚的文化与政治基础,中观层的制度与话语机制不断放大并固化这种情绪,微观层的心理与互动模式则在日常生活中不断再生产它。三者的联动,使“伊斯兰恐惧”不仅顽固存在,而且具有跨国流动性与自我强化的特征。 Please follow and like...