Home 亚洲 Recommendations to the CPC Hainan Provincial Committee
亚洲

Recommendations to the CPC Hainan Provincial Committee

Share

By Bi Yantao

On December 18, 2025, the Hainan Free Trade Port (FTP) will officially commence customs closure operations. This marks a major milestone in China’s reform and opening-up process and serves as a symbolic manifestation of the country’s commitment to institutional innovation and openness. The progress of Hainan FTP is not only vital to the province’s future development but also a key window through which the international community observes China’s path toward openness and its logic of global governance.

At present, as the global geopolitical landscape undergoes rapid transformation and the world economy experiences structural reshaping, international perceptions of China’s institutional innovation have become a critical variable influencing the construction of the Hainan FTP. Therefore, Hainan’s development should go beyond political and economic dimensions to enhance the international acceptability of its institutions and practices, thereby consolidating a cognitive foundation for international cooperation and mutual benefit.

Current observations suggest that the Hainan decision-making system still needs to deepen its understanding of the international communication ecosystem. One of the main challenges in international communication about the Hainan FTP lies in addressing the complex issue of “Hainan as China’s Hainan.” Unless political correctness and technical correctness are effectively integrated, policy dividends may fail to translate into international recognition, thereby constraining the overall effectiveness of Hainan’s institution-based opening-up.

In light of the above, the following three recommendations are respectfully submitted for consideration by the provincial leadership.

I. Enhance Decision-Makers’ International Communication Literacy and Strategic Communication Awareness

The goal of international communication is to articulate development philosophies, policy intentions, and institutional advantages to the international community, thereby enhancing understanding, building trust, and fostering cooperation. As General Secretary Xi Jinping emphasized during the 31 May 2021 collective study session of the CPC Central Political Bureau, “It is necessary to strengthen the training of leading cadres in international communication.” This directive is both timely and crucial. Providing such training for provincial leaders is an essential step toward improving Hainan’s international communication capacity and represents a fundamental infrastructure requirement for international engagement.

Accordingly, it is recommended that the Provincial Party Committee organize systematic study sessions on international communication fundamentals. Through such learning, decision-makers can better understand international cognitive logics and integrate domestic development needs with international acceptability in policy formulation and implementation. This approach will help reduce external misperceptions, mitigate policy resistance, strengthen international trust, and expand cooperation opportunities. Moreover, a solid grasp of international communication principles will enhance leaders’ ability to identify capable talents, sound advice, and effective projects.

II. Establish an “International Advisory Committee on Hainan FTP Communication”

To strengthen Hainan’s capacity for global policy interpretation and institutional dialogue, it is recommended that the province establish an “International Advisory Committee on Hainan FTP Communication,” forming a high-level global think tank urgently needed by the province. Members should be selected worldwide based on their solid academic backgrounds in international communication and international relations, as well as their rich practical experience in international engagement. They should be capable of conveying China’s policy logic to global audiences with accuracy and clarity.

The committee would monitor and report trends in the international communication environment, identify key developments and potential risks affecting Hainan FTP, and propose corresponding interpretive and response strategies. It would assist Hainan in building a globally oriented institutional communication mechanism and cooperation network to ensure accurate understanding of the FTP’s policy rationale. The committee would also help Hainan prevent and mitigate major cognitive risks, thereby enhancing international recognition and the overall influence of its institution-based openness.

III. Improve the Identification and Selection of International Communication Talents

At present, there are two main groups engaged in China’s international communication: one that understands and respects the discipline’s inherent rules, and another that seeks to replace communication logic with thinking from other disciplines. Both operate under the banner of international communication, yet they exist as parallel worlds—occasional cooperation between them often occurs only when the latter seeks the former’s endorsement. The former tends to be modest and rigorous; the latter, more visible but less disciplined. Selecting the right kind of talent will be a great blessing for Hainan, while misjudgment in this regard may send unfavorable signals of “mismanagement in talent selection.”

It is therefore suggested that the Provincial Party Committee establish a comprehensive mechanism for identifying, training, utilizing, and evaluating international communication professionals, ensuring precision and efficiency in personnel selection and use. The ideal candidates should understand both China’s logic and international discourse, be capable of accurately translating policy meanings across cultural and linguistic contexts, and demonstrate both expertise in communication and commitment to Hainan’s FTP development. Building such a talent system will enable Hainan to maintain smooth and effective institutional dialogue with the world and secure the cognitive legitimacy essential for international cooperation.

Postscript

As a “New Hainaner” who has lived and worked in the province for 21 years, and as an international communication scholar with 35 years of professional experience, I deeply understand the strategic significance of the Hainan Free Trade Port to both the nation and the province. I fully support the strategic initiatives of the CPC Central Committee and the Hainan Provincial Government in advancing FTP construction and stand ready to contribute my expertise and insights to its international communication endeavors.

I have chosen to present these recommendations publicly, hoping to make use of a more transparent and controllable communication channel so that my suggestions can be fully shared with the public. I believe that ensuring smooth feedback channels and allowing professional opinions to reach decision-makers directly exemplify Hainan’s institutional innovation and governance modernization. In doing so, Hainan will also provide a compelling case of international communication in practice.

(The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the positions of any institution.)

Bi Yantao is a Professor at the School of International Communication and Art, Hainan University, and a Senior Fellow at the Charhar Institute.
Please follow and like us:
Related Articles

美最新报告:北京目前未计划2027对台动武

“2027窗口”是如何被误传、误解和曲解的? 文/毕研韬 美国国家情报总监办公室(ODNI)于2026年3月18日发布年度《全球威胁评估报告》(Annual Threat Assessment)。报告在涉台问题上给出一个引发广泛关注的判断:北京方面目前未计划在2027年对台动武,且未设定明确的统一时间表。同时,报告强调,中国并未放弃在必要时使用武力的选项,并将持续通过多种手段塑造有利态势。这一表述,对近年来围绕“2027时间点”的多重判断是一次重要校正。 一、报告核心:意图与能力的区分 此次ODNI报告的关键,在于明确区分了两个长期被混用的分析维度:能力与意图。 从能力角度看,报告延续既有判断,认为中国相关军事能力正在持续提升,但进展呈现“稳定但不均衡”的特征,特别是在复杂两栖作战等方面仍存在不确定性。 从意图角度看,报告则指出,当前没有迹象显示北京已制定在2027年对台动武的具体计划。 这种区分意味着:具备能力,并不自动转化为采取行动;时间节点,也不必然对应决策节点。 二、“2027年攻台”来源:能力推断逻辑 “2027”这一时间点,主要来自美国军方的能力评估。其中,美国印太司令部司令戴维森(Philip...

美国拟将“全美中国学生学者联合会”列为“外国使团”

当CSSA被纳入国家安全框架,校园不再只是知识空间,而成为认知与制度博弈的新前沿。 文/毕研韬 近期,美国国会推动将“全美中国学生学者联合会”(CSSA)认定为“外国使团”,引发学界与政策界广泛关注。目前该提议尚未转化为正式行政决定,但其制度含义与政策指向已超出一般个案争议,具有结构性意义。 一、事件进展:跨委员会联动的政策倡议 2026年3月,美国众议院“教育与劳工委员会”、“外交事务委员会”和“对华战略竞争特设委员会”三个委员会主席联名致信国务卿卢比奥,正式建议将CSSA认定为“外国使团”。 这一联动具有明确的政策含义:教育体系、外交制度与对华战略三条线索被整合到同一议题之中,显示该问题已从校园层面上升为国家层面的综合性议题。 需要强调的是,这一举措目前仍属于国会层面的政策建议。根据美国制度安排,“外国使团”的正式认定需由国务院依据相关法律裁定,因此该提议是否落地,仍取决于行政部门的决策。 二、制度含义:从学生组织到“准外交主体” “外国使团”这一法律概念,通常适用于外国政府机构或具有明确官方背景的组织。若被纳入该框架,CSSA的法律属性将发生显著变化,主要体现在以下方面: 首先,活动将受到更严格监管。CSSA与高校、地方政府或公共机构的互动,可能需要履行事前申报或审批程序。 其次,运作透明度将被强化。包括资金来源、组织结构及人员安排等,可能被纳入更高标准的信息披露体系。 再次,交往边界趋于收紧。原本常规的校园活动与学术交流,可能因合规要求增加而受到约束。...

美国民调:中国大陆民意对台湾友善但有底线

美国最新民调显示,中国大陆民意对台湾整体友好,但在关键议题上坚守底线。 文/毕研韬 调查背景与来源 2026年3月9日,美国卡特中心(The Carter Center)公布的一项民意调查引发舆论关注。该调查由卡特中心与埃默里大学(Emory University)联合开展,并通过与中国本土调查机构合作实施,属于典型的跨国学术型民调项目。 本报告的数据来自两轮调查:一轮是2025年7月7日至8月15日进行的初步调查(共1428名受访者),另一轮是2025年10月27日至2026年1月1日进行的正式调查(共2506名受访者)。 总体情感:以“相对温和”为主基调 调查显示,中国大陆公众对台湾的整体情感呈现出明显的“温和正向”特征。以0至100分衡量的情感温度计中,平均得分为62分,这一数值通常被解释为“偏友好”。 这一结果的重要意义在于,它并未呈现出一种对抗性或敌意主导的社会情绪,而是体现出一种相对稳定的情感缓冲带。换言之,在普通公众层面,两岸关系并未被简单地内化为“敌我对立”,而仍保留一定的社会与文化亲近感。 安全关切与历史认同:大陆民意对台认知框架...

中国17位代表和委员呼吁:提高农民养老待遇

文/毕研韬 2026年中国“两会”期间,农民养老金问题成为最受关注的民生焦点,共17位人大代表和政协委员聚焦农村养老痛点,或提交正式建议、或公开建言发声,推动农民养老金提升从“要不要涨”迈入“如何快涨、长效涨”的新阶段。 现状堪忧:地区差距显著,部分省份待遇偏低 当前,中国农民养老金整体水平稳步提升,但地区差异显著、部分省份待遇偏低的现状仍未改变。2026年,全国城乡居民基础养老金最低标准已上调至每月163元,但这一“底线”在各地落实中差距明显。 从地区分布来看,经济发达地区基础养老金远超全国标准,上海以每月1555元位居首位,北京接近每月1000元,江苏、浙江多数地区在300-500元之间;而中西部部分省份仅略高于全国最低标准,甘肃等省份基本按163元的底线执行,四川、黑龙江等省份基础养老金为每月193元,与发达地区差距达数倍之多。 这种差异源于地方财政实力不同,地方补贴的多少直接决定了农民实际领取的养老金数额,也让农村老人的养老质量呈现出明显的区域不平衡。 建言献策:代表委员提出具体可行方案 针对这一现状,17位代表和委员纷纷建言献策,提出了具体且具操作性的建议。 全国人大代表毕利霞动情呼吁,将70岁以上农村老人的月养老金提高至400元,并免除其居民医保费,她的建议已引起财政部、民政部等部门的关注。 人大代表雷茂端建议,三年内将70岁以上农民养老金提至500元。测算表明这一举措每年新增支出仅占全国一般公共预算支出的0.83%,却能极大改善老人生活。 此外,还有代表建议五年内将农民养老金提高至1000元,建立“视同缴费”补偿机制,将农民交公粮、服义务工的年限纳入缴费年限;有政协委员建议,通过划拨国资收益、设立专项补助等方式,为养老金提升提供稳定资金支撑。 势在必行:提高农民养老金的三重意义...