Home 亚洲 Recommendations to the CPC Hainan Provincial Committee
亚洲

Recommendations to the CPC Hainan Provincial Committee

Share

By Bi Yantao

On December 18, 2025, the Hainan Free Trade Port (FTP) will officially commence customs closure operations. This marks a major milestone in China’s reform and opening-up process and serves as a symbolic manifestation of the country’s commitment to institutional innovation and openness. The progress of Hainan FTP is not only vital to the province’s future development but also a key window through which the international community observes China’s path toward openness and its logic of global governance.

At present, as the global geopolitical landscape undergoes rapid transformation and the world economy experiences structural reshaping, international perceptions of China’s institutional innovation have become a critical variable influencing the construction of the Hainan FTP. Therefore, Hainan’s development should go beyond political and economic dimensions to enhance the international acceptability of its institutions and practices, thereby consolidating a cognitive foundation for international cooperation and mutual benefit.

Current observations suggest that the Hainan decision-making system still needs to deepen its understanding of the international communication ecosystem. One of the main challenges in international communication about the Hainan FTP lies in addressing the complex issue of “Hainan as China’s Hainan.” Unless political correctness and technical correctness are effectively integrated, policy dividends may fail to translate into international recognition, thereby constraining the overall effectiveness of Hainan’s institution-based opening-up.

In light of the above, the following three recommendations are respectfully submitted for consideration by the provincial leadership.

I. Enhance Decision-Makers’ International Communication Literacy and Strategic Communication Awareness

The goal of international communication is to articulate development philosophies, policy intentions, and institutional advantages to the international community, thereby enhancing understanding, building trust, and fostering cooperation. As General Secretary Xi Jinping emphasized during the 31 May 2021 collective study session of the CPC Central Political Bureau, “It is necessary to strengthen the training of leading cadres in international communication.” This directive is both timely and crucial. Providing such training for provincial leaders is an essential step toward improving Hainan’s international communication capacity and represents a fundamental infrastructure requirement for international engagement.

Accordingly, it is recommended that the Provincial Party Committee organize systematic study sessions on international communication fundamentals. Through such learning, decision-makers can better understand international cognitive logics and integrate domestic development needs with international acceptability in policy formulation and implementation. This approach will help reduce external misperceptions, mitigate policy resistance, strengthen international trust, and expand cooperation opportunities. Moreover, a solid grasp of international communication principles will enhance leaders’ ability to identify capable talents, sound advice, and effective projects.

II. Establish an “International Advisory Committee on Hainan FTP Communication”

To strengthen Hainan’s capacity for global policy interpretation and institutional dialogue, it is recommended that the province establish an “International Advisory Committee on Hainan FTP Communication,” forming a high-level global think tank urgently needed by the province. Members should be selected worldwide based on their solid academic backgrounds in international communication and international relations, as well as their rich practical experience in international engagement. They should be capable of conveying China’s policy logic to global audiences with accuracy and clarity.

The committee would monitor and report trends in the international communication environment, identify key developments and potential risks affecting Hainan FTP, and propose corresponding interpretive and response strategies. It would assist Hainan in building a globally oriented institutional communication mechanism and cooperation network to ensure accurate understanding of the FTP’s policy rationale. The committee would also help Hainan prevent and mitigate major cognitive risks, thereby enhancing international recognition and the overall influence of its institution-based openness.

III. Improve the Identification and Selection of International Communication Talents

At present, there are two main groups engaged in China’s international communication: one that understands and respects the discipline’s inherent rules, and another that seeks to replace communication logic with thinking from other disciplines. Both operate under the banner of international communication, yet they exist as parallel worlds—occasional cooperation between them often occurs only when the latter seeks the former’s endorsement. The former tends to be modest and rigorous; the latter, more visible but less disciplined. Selecting the right kind of talent will be a great blessing for Hainan, while misjudgment in this regard may send unfavorable signals of “mismanagement in talent selection.”

It is therefore suggested that the Provincial Party Committee establish a comprehensive mechanism for identifying, training, utilizing, and evaluating international communication professionals, ensuring precision and efficiency in personnel selection and use. The ideal candidates should understand both China’s logic and international discourse, be capable of accurately translating policy meanings across cultural and linguistic contexts, and demonstrate both expertise in communication and commitment to Hainan’s FTP development. Building such a talent system will enable Hainan to maintain smooth and effective institutional dialogue with the world and secure the cognitive legitimacy essential for international cooperation.

Postscript

As a “New Hainaner” who has lived and worked in the province for 21 years, and as an international communication scholar with 35 years of professional experience, I deeply understand the strategic significance of the Hainan Free Trade Port to both the nation and the province. I fully support the strategic initiatives of the CPC Central Committee and the Hainan Provincial Government in advancing FTP construction and stand ready to contribute my expertise and insights to its international communication endeavors.

I have chosen to present these recommendations publicly, hoping to make use of a more transparent and controllable communication channel so that my suggestions can be fully shared with the public. I believe that ensuring smooth feedback channels and allowing professional opinions to reach decision-makers directly exemplify Hainan’s institutional innovation and governance modernization. In doing so, Hainan will also provide a compelling case of international communication in practice.

(The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the positions of any institution.)

Bi Yantao is a Professor at the School of International Communication and Art, Hainan University, and a Senior Fellow at the Charhar Institute.
Please follow and like us:
Related Articles

美国发布2025《国家安全战略》: 对华定位调整,台湾成焦点

文/毕研韬 2025年12月,美国发布新版《国家安全战略》(NSS),这是特朗普第二任期的一份核心战略文件。新战略在外交、安全、经济与供应链政策等方面做出重大调整,其中“中国”被提及21次,“台湾”被提及8次。 一、新版NSS的总体架构:现实主义回归+国力优先 新版NSS核心理念是:实力为本、利益优先,同时兼顾安全和国力的整体布局。主要特征包括: 1.“核心国家利益+国力基础”重构:战略强调美国必须恢复其产业基础、供应链自主、关键技术领先与军事优势。经济安全、技术优势、工业复兴被提升为国家安全基础。 2.“灵活现实主义”(Flexible realism):与过去强调价值输出、民主推广不同,本次报告放弃了广泛输出民主与人权制度的目标。文件明确表示,美国将“寻求与各国建立良好的和平商业关系,而不强加不同社会制度或传统”。  3.战略重心转移与安全威胁重新排序:报告对欧洲、传统多边机制的关注大为减少,对西半球、拉美的关注上升,同时把印太地区、供应链安全、技术竞争、地缘对抗等列为核心领域。 二、对华(含台湾)政策:从结构性竞争到多维战略配置 报告中,“中国”与“台湾”出现频次高(分别为21次、8次),足见其在2025版NSS中的重要性。与以往相比,新版安全战略有以下主要变化: 1.将中国定义为“结构性对手/全面战略竞争者” 报告指出,美国过去对华的“市场开放+规则基础秩序”假设失败。它明确批评:过去三十多年对华接触政策“让对华经济依赖加深,却未能让中国融入由美国主导的规则秩序”,反而让中国“更富、更强”。报告将中国崛起视为对美国长期利益与全球秩序的系统性挑战。...

2026年,中美关系将进一步恶化:欧洲权威智库

中美关系或将迎来新一轮下行周期,全球格局也将随之更加动荡。 文/毕研韬 近期,欧洲最有影响力的中国研究机构德国墨卡托中国研究中心(MERICS)发布了《2026中国预测》(China Forecast 2026)年度报告,报告最抓眼的一句话是: “2026年,中美关系很可能在多个方向进一步恶化。” 一、专家几乎“一边倒”:中美在五大领域都可能更紧张 MERICS通过问卷、访谈等方式,邀请了百余名欧洲和国际中国问题专家参与预测。结果显示: 在政治、贸易、科技、投资安全、军事安全等领域,大多数专家都认为:中美关系 2026 年大概率会变得更紧张。其中 2.贸易摩擦可能再升级 国际供应链正在重构,各国都在重新算账、分散风险。中美在新能源、制造业、数字经济等领域的政策分歧越来越大,“贸易安全”“产业补贴”等议题都会成为矛盾点。 3.亚太地区将继续成为热点...

美国国会最新报告:未来十年是全球叙事竞争的高峰期

文/毕研韬 11月18日,美国国会发布了一份关于中国的年度报告,引发美国、欧洲以及亚洲舆论的强烈关注。 这份《2025年美中经济与安全审查委员会年度报告》(USCC Annual Report)用了少见的尖锐措辞,提出一个极具冲击力的判断: 中国正在推动一种“可能改写全球秩序”的新力量。 一、这份报告是谁写的?为什么重要? USCC(美中经济与安全审查委员会)成立于2000年,由美国国会直接任命委员,其职责是评估中国的发展对美国经济、技术与国家安全的影响。 这份报告的重要性在于:它是美国国会了解中国的重要依据;常被用于指导美国对华立法和行政政策;一直被视为美国“对华强硬派”的风向标。 换句话说,这不是一份普通的学术报告,而是美国政治系统对中国的年度“官方判断”。 二、核心警告:中国正在塑造一种“替代性世界秩序” 这次引发全球媒体聚焦的,就是报告中的这一判断:...

琉球“新战场”:本质是中日叙事权之争

文/毕研韬 在中日关系紧张、东亚地缘政治再度重构的当下,琉球(日本称“冲绳群岛”)问题正在成为一个新战场。这场争夺,并不只是关乎领土归属,更是在深层上对历史、国际法与文化认同的叙事权之争。 一、历史根基:中琉关系的复杂性与争议性 从历史来看,琉球王国与中国(明清)长期有册封和朝贡制度关系。根据明清官方史料,琉球国王每逢登基,都需派使向中国请求册封。法学研究指出,从 1372 年明朝册封琉球中山王起,琉球就维持着与中国的藩属关系。  这一点,在现代叙事中极具分量。许多中国学者主张,这种历史制度并非简单的“文化联系”,而是构成中琉之间政治与国际关系互动的重要基础。正如《中国社会科学院东海问题研究中心》学者在“琉球学”建设讨论中所言:这一制度是构建“中国与琉球共同历史记忆”的关键。 与此同时,日本对这一历史关系的解释则更为简化。日本传统叙事强调琉球已被“内化”为日本的一部分。1860–1870 年代,日本逐步将琉球纳入其国家机制,最终在 1879 年废藩置县,将琉球变为冲绳县。 这一段历史在中日两国叙述中具有极大争议。中国视角强调册封与朝贡关系意味中方在历史上有重大的制度性影响,而日本传统叙事则聚焦其“领土主张”和“国家统一”的合法性。...