Home 亚洲 Recommendations to the CPC Hainan Provincial Committee
亚洲

Recommendations to the CPC Hainan Provincial Committee

Share

By Bi Yantao

On December 18, 2025, the Hainan Free Trade Port (FTP) will officially commence customs closure operations. This marks a major milestone in China’s reform and opening-up process and serves as a symbolic manifestation of the country’s commitment to institutional innovation and openness. The progress of Hainan FTP is not only vital to the province’s future development but also a key window through which the international community observes China’s path toward openness and its logic of global governance.

At present, as the global geopolitical landscape undergoes rapid transformation and the world economy experiences structural reshaping, international perceptions of China’s institutional innovation have become a critical variable influencing the construction of the Hainan FTP. Therefore, Hainan’s development should go beyond political and economic dimensions to enhance the international acceptability of its institutions and practices, thereby consolidating a cognitive foundation for international cooperation and mutual benefit.

Current observations suggest that the Hainan decision-making system still needs to deepen its understanding of the international communication ecosystem. One of the main challenges in international communication about the Hainan FTP lies in addressing the complex issue of “Hainan as China’s Hainan.” Unless political correctness and technical correctness are effectively integrated, policy dividends may fail to translate into international recognition, thereby constraining the overall effectiveness of Hainan’s institution-based opening-up.

In light of the above, the following three recommendations are respectfully submitted for consideration by the provincial leadership.

I. Enhance Decision-Makers’ International Communication Literacy and Strategic Communication Awareness

The goal of international communication is to articulate development philosophies, policy intentions, and institutional advantages to the international community, thereby enhancing understanding, building trust, and fostering cooperation. As General Secretary Xi Jinping emphasized during the 31 May 2021 collective study session of the CPC Central Political Bureau, “It is necessary to strengthen the training of leading cadres in international communication.” This directive is both timely and crucial. Providing such training for provincial leaders is an essential step toward improving Hainan’s international communication capacity and represents a fundamental infrastructure requirement for international engagement.

Accordingly, it is recommended that the Provincial Party Committee organize systematic study sessions on international communication fundamentals. Through such learning, decision-makers can better understand international cognitive logics and integrate domestic development needs with international acceptability in policy formulation and implementation. This approach will help reduce external misperceptions, mitigate policy resistance, strengthen international trust, and expand cooperation opportunities. Moreover, a solid grasp of international communication principles will enhance leaders’ ability to identify capable talents, sound advice, and effective projects.

II. Establish an “International Advisory Committee on Hainan FTP Communication”

To strengthen Hainan’s capacity for global policy interpretation and institutional dialogue, it is recommended that the province establish an “International Advisory Committee on Hainan FTP Communication,” forming a high-level global think tank urgently needed by the province. Members should be selected worldwide based on their solid academic backgrounds in international communication and international relations, as well as their rich practical experience in international engagement. They should be capable of conveying China’s policy logic to global audiences with accuracy and clarity.

The committee would monitor and report trends in the international communication environment, identify key developments and potential risks affecting Hainan FTP, and propose corresponding interpretive and response strategies. It would assist Hainan in building a globally oriented institutional communication mechanism and cooperation network to ensure accurate understanding of the FTP’s policy rationale. The committee would also help Hainan prevent and mitigate major cognitive risks, thereby enhancing international recognition and the overall influence of its institution-based openness.

III. Improve the Identification and Selection of International Communication Talents

At present, there are two main groups engaged in China’s international communication: one that understands and respects the discipline’s inherent rules, and another that seeks to replace communication logic with thinking from other disciplines. Both operate under the banner of international communication, yet they exist as parallel worlds—occasional cooperation between them often occurs only when the latter seeks the former’s endorsement. The former tends to be modest and rigorous; the latter, more visible but less disciplined. Selecting the right kind of talent will be a great blessing for Hainan, while misjudgment in this regard may send unfavorable signals of “mismanagement in talent selection.”

It is therefore suggested that the Provincial Party Committee establish a comprehensive mechanism for identifying, training, utilizing, and evaluating international communication professionals, ensuring precision and efficiency in personnel selection and use. The ideal candidates should understand both China’s logic and international discourse, be capable of accurately translating policy meanings across cultural and linguistic contexts, and demonstrate both expertise in communication and commitment to Hainan’s FTP development. Building such a talent system will enable Hainan to maintain smooth and effective institutional dialogue with the world and secure the cognitive legitimacy essential for international cooperation.

Postscript

As a “New Hainaner” who has lived and worked in the province for 21 years, and as an international communication scholar with 35 years of professional experience, I deeply understand the strategic significance of the Hainan Free Trade Port to both the nation and the province. I fully support the strategic initiatives of the CPC Central Committee and the Hainan Provincial Government in advancing FTP construction and stand ready to contribute my expertise and insights to its international communication endeavors.

I have chosen to present these recommendations publicly, hoping to make use of a more transparent and controllable communication channel so that my suggestions can be fully shared with the public. I believe that ensuring smooth feedback channels and allowing professional opinions to reach decision-makers directly exemplify Hainan’s institutional innovation and governance modernization. In doing so, Hainan will also provide a compelling case of international communication in practice.

(The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the positions of any institution.)

Bi Yantao is a Professor at the School of International Communication and Art, Hainan University, and a Senior Fellow at the Charhar Institute.
Related Articles

西藏国际传播大会:究竟要影响谁?

举办国际传播大会并不意味着实现国际传播。面对复杂的国际认知环境,西藏国际传播究竟希望影响谁,又如何进入他们的理解框架? 作者:毕研韬  发表时间:2026年6月18日 6月16日,第二届西藏国际传播大会在拉萨召开。大会以“理解与支持·共情与共鸣——全面增强涉藏国际传播效能”为主题,围绕叙事创新、技术赋能、主体协同等议题展开讨论,吸引了来自媒体、高校、智库和相关机构的数百名代表参加。 然而截至北京时间6月18日15时,西方主流英文媒体几乎都没有报道。这是一个值得思考的现象。 目前能够检索到的报道主要来自中国官方媒体、港澳台媒体以及部分国际友中媒体。 那么,西藏国际传播大会,到底要影响谁? 一、选准目标受众,决定传播能否成功 国际传播首先要选择受众,而不是生产内容。如果目标受众不明确,再丰富的内容供给也可能无法产生预期效果。 从第二届西藏国际传播大会的公开议程看,其核心目标是“讲好新时代西藏故事”“增强涉藏国际传播效能”“提升国际传播力、影响力和穿透力”。 问题在于,这些信息最终要传递给哪些人?西方主流社会?国际媒体?海外学界?国际组织?发展中国家公众?海外华人群体? 西藏国际传播大会,是侧重内部动员,还是对外传播?...

西藏国际传播的真正难题:不是信息不足,而是认知隔阂

为什么关于西藏的信息越来越多,国际认知分歧却依然存在?问题的关键,可能不是信息不足,而是认知隔阂。 作者:毕研韬  发表时间:2026年6月17日 西藏一直是中国国际传播中最受关注、最具挑战的议题之一。 多年来,中国围绕西藏开展了大量国际传播实践。除了传统的新闻报道、文化交流外,还派遣人员赴海外介绍西藏情况,邀请境外人士赴藏参访调研。 然而从国际舆论反馈看,西藏仍然是认知分歧最明显的中国议题之一。 这不禁让人思考:问题究竟出在哪里? 很多人习惯从传播技术层面寻找答案,例如语言不够精准、渠道覆盖不足、国际话语能力不强,或者故事讲得不够生动。也有人从地缘政治角度加以剖析。 这些因素当然存在,但如果仅仅将问题归结于传播技术,可能无法触及问题的核心。 西藏国际传播面临的真正挑战,或许并不是信息不足,而是认知隔阂。 一、不同的人,看见的是不同的西藏 传播学有一个基本认识:人们接收信息时,并不是像照相机一样客观记录现实,而是通过各自的认知框架理解现实。...

欧盟日本联手应对“信息操纵”,意味着什么?

欧盟与日本启动首次FIMI对话,标志着国际传播加速进入安全治理框架,并开始呈现跨区域协同化趋势。 作者:毕研韬  发表时间:2026年6月14日 2026年6月3日,欧盟与日本举行首次“外国信息操纵与干预(FIMI)对话”。 从表面看,这是一次围绕虚假信息与影响行动的政策交流机制启动,但从参与机构结构与议题组织方式来看,这一机制已明显超出一般外交沟通范畴,进入跨部门安全协同的制度轨道。 其关键不在于“是否开展合作”,而在于“由谁参与合作、如何定义问题”。 一、问题定义的变化:从传播议题转向安全议题 FIMI(Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference)这一概念本身就具有再定义属性。它将原本属于国际传播、公共外交与媒体研究范畴的议题,重新归类为“外国行为体的信息操纵与干预”。...

为什么绝大多数中国人难以全面了解国际形势?

作者:毕研韬 发表时间:2026年6月14日 国际形势正在以前所未有的速度影响中国社会。 中美关系、俄乌冲突、巴以冲突、台海局势、全球产业链重组、人工智能竞争……这些国际议题越来越频繁地进入公众视野。 然而,一个值得认真思考的问题是:中国公众对国际形势的了解究竟有多全面? 这里所说的国际形势,主要是指国际政治环境、国家间关系以及重大国际事件的发展趋势。 本文并不讨论公众是否掌握国际法、外交学或国际关系理论,也不讨论普通人是否具备专业分析能力。 我们讨论的是一个更基础的问题:公众能否获得足量、优质、多元的信息? 如果答案是否定的,那么认知局限就不是个人能力问题,而是信息结构问题。 一、国际形势认知首先取决于信息来源 任何人对国际事务的理解,都建立在信息基础之上。 认知的高度不仅取决于思考能力,还取决于信息视野。当人们看到的只是现实的一部分时,对整体局势的理解自然会受到限制。...