Home 亚洲 A Letter Sent to WTO Director-General on US-China Tariff Issues
亚洲北美

A Letter Sent to WTO Director-General on US-China Tariff Issues

Share
Editor’s Note: On April 23, 2025, as Editor-in-Chief of Communication Without Borders (CWB), Professor Bi Yantao sent a letter to WTO Director-General Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala. The letter proposes that the WTO discreetly facilitate informal, rules-based contact between China and the United States as a means of easing escalating tariff tensions and reopening channels of dialogue without political pressure. The full text of the letter is as follows. 

To: Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala
Director-General
World Trade Organization (WTO)
Rue de Lausanne 154
CH-1211 Geneva 2
Switzerland

Dear Dr. Okonjo-Iweala,

Subject: A Proposal for WTO-Led Facilitation of Informal Contact Between China and the United States on Tariff Issues

I hope this letter finds you well.

As a communication scholar and observer of international strategic narratives, I am writing to respectfully suggest that the World Trade Organization consider facilitating a new form of dialogue—discreet, informal, and rules-based—between China and the United States in response to their ongoing and escalating tariff standoff.

Since 2025, the tariff confrontation between the two largest economies has reached unprecedented levels, with average U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods reportedly approaching 145%, and reciprocal measures from China affecting nearly all American exports. While the situation has evolved beyond a mere trade dispute into a deeper systemic rivalry, I believe the WTO remains uniquely positioned to provide a neutral, rules-oriented environment for re-engagement.

I am not suggesting formal negotiations or any high-level summit that may carry political sensitivities. Rather, I envision a WTO-facilitated platform for asymmetric contact—quiet, unofficial interactions held on the sidelines of technical meetings, mini-ministerials, or thematic workshops. Such contact can help reduce misperceptions, de-escalate tensions, and eventually lay the foundation for substantive exchanges without requiring either party to publicly appear to concede ground.

The WTO’s legitimacy, multilateral credibility, and technical capacity make it the most suitable actor to host such engagements, especially under the framing of shared responsibility for maintaining global trade stability. In this regard, informal consultations or roundtables on topics such as “tariff spillover effects on global inflation” or “trade policy coherence amid geopolitical shifts” may offer productive starting points.

Your leadership in navigating WTO through difficult times has been inspirational, and I trust your judgment in recognizing the diplomatic opportunities that multilateralism still affords. I would be honored to further elaborate on this idea, if desired, and I hope this proposal will contribute to ongoing efforts toward global economic stability and peace.

With my highest respect,

Prof. Bi Yantao  

Editor-in-chief
Communication Without Borders (CWB)
www.borderlesscomm.com

The illustration was generated by Grok, with thanks.

Please follow and like us:
Related Articles

王沪宁论中美外交风格差异

1995年,上海人民出版社出版了王沪宁日记《政治的人生》,他在该书第116页写道: 注:“[外交]”是《无界传播》编辑加的。 Please follow and like us:

中国已建成453个区域国别研究机构(更新版)

文/《无界传播》信息中心 北京时间2025年9月23日17时更新 近年来,中国区域国别研究体系建设步伐加快。根据中国社会科学网报道,截至2022年底,中国教育部已批准建设 453个区域国别研究培育基地和备案中心,分布在 186所高校(中国社会科学网,2024年2月23日)。 这些是中国教育部批准成立的区域国别研究机构,实际上各省、直辖市、自治区教育厅还自行批准培育了若干区域国别研究机构。 需要明确的是,这453个机构在性质上并不完全相同,大致可分为以下两类: 一、培育基地(42个) 培育基地是教育部重点扶持的区域国别研究平台。它们通常具有以下特征: 二、备案中心(411个) 备案中心数量庞大,但形式多样,实体化程度差异显著: 从宏观上看,教育部备案的453个区域国别研究机构,为中国加强对外认知和国际传播提供了广泛的学术与智力支撑。然而,从建设质量上看,真正具有可持续研究能力和独立运作条件的实体机构仍显不足。未来,中国的区域国别研究需要在数量之外,更加注重实体化和高水平研究平台的建设,以提升对国家战略的支撑力。...

ChatGPT 用户规模再创新高:每周活跃用户突破 8 亿

文/毕研韬 根据数据研究公司 Demandsage 于 2025 年 8 月 14 日发布的统计数据,ChatGPT 的用户规模持续增长,展现出显著的市场影响力。 截至...

中国新型大学试验:福耀科技大学会成功吗

南方科技大学与福耀科技大学分别代表两种新型大学探索,是否也会遭遇两种不同的命运? 文/毕研韬 中国高校正处在制度转型的关口:过度行政化,学术自治受限,难以灵活回应产业与社会需求。如何突围,成为摆在改革者面前的现实课题。南方科技大学与福耀科技大学,恰好代表了两种不同的新型大学探索:一个理念超前却遭遇折戟,一个顺势而为引发社会期待。 一、南科大的超前试验 南方科技大学自 2007 年筹建以来,明确提出“去行政化、教授治校、国际化培养”的理念,意在打破传统高校的官本位逻辑。它尝试自主招生、强调教授治校、推动国际合作,目标是打造一个与全球顶尖大学接轨的学术共同体。 但这一试验过于超前。社会对绕开高考的招生方式缺乏认同,舆论质疑不断,监管部门也难以放任制度突破。最终,南科大纳入公办体系,其制度创新的锋芒被削弱。经验表明:先进理念如果与社会认知和制度土壤脱节,往往难以生根发芽。 二、福耀科大的顺势登场 与南科大的路径不同,2025 年开学的福耀科技大学,强调“小而精、面向产业、服务国家战略”。其治理结构采用理事会制,资金来源于企业家捐赠和慈善基金,政府则提供政策支持,形成“企业+政府+教育”的三元合作模式。 福耀科大的出现正值社会认知的成熟期:公众已普遍意识到行政化高校的弊端,产业界迫切需要与高校深度对接,政府亦鼓励多元办学。在这样的背景下,福耀科大的探索不仅没有超前,反而切合了产业和社会的现实需求,因此获得了广泛关注与政策扶持。...