Home 亚洲 Recommendations to the CPC Hainan Provincial Committee
亚洲

Recommendations to the CPC Hainan Provincial Committee

Share

By Bi Yantao

On December 18, 2025, the Hainan Free Trade Port (FTP) will officially commence customs closure operations. This marks a major milestone in China’s reform and opening-up process and serves as a symbolic manifestation of the country’s commitment to institutional innovation and openness. The progress of Hainan FTP is not only vital to the province’s future development but also a key window through which the international community observes China’s path toward openness and its logic of global governance.

At present, as the global geopolitical landscape undergoes rapid transformation and the world economy experiences structural reshaping, international perceptions of China’s institutional innovation have become a critical variable influencing the construction of the Hainan FTP. Therefore, Hainan’s development should go beyond political and economic dimensions to enhance the international acceptability of its institutions and practices, thereby consolidating a cognitive foundation for international cooperation and mutual benefit.

Current observations suggest that the Hainan decision-making system still needs to deepen its understanding of the international communication ecosystem. One of the main challenges in international communication about the Hainan FTP lies in addressing the complex issue of “Hainan as China’s Hainan.” Unless political correctness and technical correctness are effectively integrated, policy dividends may fail to translate into international recognition, thereby constraining the overall effectiveness of Hainan’s institution-based opening-up.

In light of the above, the following three recommendations are respectfully submitted for consideration by the provincial leadership.

I. Enhance Decision-Makers’ International Communication Literacy and Strategic Communication Awareness

The goal of international communication is to articulate development philosophies, policy intentions, and institutional advantages to the international community, thereby enhancing understanding, building trust, and fostering cooperation. As General Secretary Xi Jinping emphasized during the 31 May 2021 collective study session of the CPC Central Political Bureau, “It is necessary to strengthen the training of leading cadres in international communication.” This directive is both timely and crucial. Providing such training for provincial leaders is an essential step toward improving Hainan’s international communication capacity and represents a fundamental infrastructure requirement for international engagement.

Accordingly, it is recommended that the Provincial Party Committee organize systematic study sessions on international communication fundamentals. Through such learning, decision-makers can better understand international cognitive logics and integrate domestic development needs with international acceptability in policy formulation and implementation. This approach will help reduce external misperceptions, mitigate policy resistance, strengthen international trust, and expand cooperation opportunities. Moreover, a solid grasp of international communication principles will enhance leaders’ ability to identify capable talents, sound advice, and effective projects.

II. Establish an “International Advisory Committee on Hainan FTP Communication”

To strengthen Hainan’s capacity for global policy interpretation and institutional dialogue, it is recommended that the province establish an “International Advisory Committee on Hainan FTP Communication,” forming a high-level global think tank urgently needed by the province. Members should be selected worldwide based on their solid academic backgrounds in international communication and international relations, as well as their rich practical experience in international engagement. They should be capable of conveying China’s policy logic to global audiences with accuracy and clarity.

The committee would monitor and report trends in the international communication environment, identify key developments and potential risks affecting Hainan FTP, and propose corresponding interpretive and response strategies. It would assist Hainan in building a globally oriented institutional communication mechanism and cooperation network to ensure accurate understanding of the FTP’s policy rationale. The committee would also help Hainan prevent and mitigate major cognitive risks, thereby enhancing international recognition and the overall influence of its institution-based openness.

III. Improve the Identification and Selection of International Communication Talents

At present, there are two main groups engaged in China’s international communication: one that understands and respects the discipline’s inherent rules, and another that seeks to replace communication logic with thinking from other disciplines. Both operate under the banner of international communication, yet they exist as parallel worlds—occasional cooperation between them often occurs only when the latter seeks the former’s endorsement. The former tends to be modest and rigorous; the latter, more visible but less disciplined. Selecting the right kind of talent will be a great blessing for Hainan, while misjudgment in this regard may send unfavorable signals of “mismanagement in talent selection.”

It is therefore suggested that the Provincial Party Committee establish a comprehensive mechanism for identifying, training, utilizing, and evaluating international communication professionals, ensuring precision and efficiency in personnel selection and use. The ideal candidates should understand both China’s logic and international discourse, be capable of accurately translating policy meanings across cultural and linguistic contexts, and demonstrate both expertise in communication and commitment to Hainan’s FTP development. Building such a talent system will enable Hainan to maintain smooth and effective institutional dialogue with the world and secure the cognitive legitimacy essential for international cooperation.

Postscript

As a “New Hainaner” who has lived and worked in the province for 21 years, and as an international communication scholar with 35 years of professional experience, I deeply understand the strategic significance of the Hainan Free Trade Port to both the nation and the province. I fully support the strategic initiatives of the CPC Central Committee and the Hainan Provincial Government in advancing FTP construction and stand ready to contribute my expertise and insights to its international communication endeavors.

I have chosen to present these recommendations publicly, hoping to make use of a more transparent and controllable communication channel so that my suggestions can be fully shared with the public. I believe that ensuring smooth feedback channels and allowing professional opinions to reach decision-makers directly exemplify Hainan’s institutional innovation and governance modernization. In doing so, Hainan will also provide a compelling case of international communication in practice.

(The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the positions of any institution.)

Bi Yantao is a Professor at the School of International Communication and Art, Hainan University, and a Senior Fellow at the Charhar Institute.
Related Articles

蒋万安和沈伯洋谁领先?不要轻信民调

民调究竟是在测量民意,还是在塑造民意? 作者:毕研韬 | 发布时间:2026年11月3日 台北市长选举进入倒计时,国民党籍现任市长蒋万安与民进党候选人沈伯洋之间的竞争,成为台湾媒体与社会关注的焦点。一个有趣的现象是,不同媒体报道的民调结果竟然呈现出截然不同的选情图景:有的显示沈伯洋大幅领先,有的则显示蒋万安保持优势。 究竟谁领先? 我的建议是:不要急于相信任何一项民调。更值得关注的,是民调如何产生、如何发布,以及媒体如何使用民调。 一、相互矛盾的民调,究竟说明什么? 2026年11月1日至2日,几项民调结果引起关注。 台湾韬略策进学会委托窩窩科技进行的调查显示,沈伯洋支持度为52.6%,蒋万安为35.3%,沈伯洋领先17.3个百分点。 与此同时,ETtoday民调云公布的调查显示,蒋万安支持度为52.0%,沈伯洋为40.7%,蒋万安领先11.3个百分点。 两项调查的结果不仅方向相反,而且领先幅度都不小。...

从今年万圣节气氛,看中国各地的文化反省

文化自信究竟意味着什么?当中国希望世界拥抱春节时,是否也应该以开放的心态接纳万圣节?今年各地的节庆景象,让这个问题再次进入公共讨论。 作者:毕研韬 | 发布时间:2026年11月3日 今年万圣节期间,中国多个城市出现了比往年更加活跃的节庆气氛。成都、深圳、北京等地的年轻人积极参与变装、角色扮演和主题派对,节日氛围有所升温。与此同时,上海、杭州等地部分街头活动仍受到一定程度的管理。 与往年相比,今年万圣节呈现出一个值得关注的变化:社会对外来节日似乎更加包容,围绕洋节的公共讨论也出现了一些新的反思。这种变化是否意味着中国社会的文化心态正在趋于开放? 一、过洋节就是崇洋媚外吗? 过去相当长一段时间里,万圣节、圣诞节等西方节日经常被置于文化安全和文化认同的框架下讨论。一些人将过洋节与崇洋媚外联系起来,甚至将其视为西方文化入侵的表现。 但今年,社会上出现了更多不同的声音:过万圣节为什么就意味着崇洋媚外?参加圣诞派对就意味着认同西方价值观?外国人接纳中国春节,为什么我们不将其视为文化入侵? 这些问题实际上触及一个更深层次的矛盾:我们究竟该如何理解文化自信? 中国积极推动春节等传统文化走向世界,希望更多外国人了解和体验中国文化。如果我们期待其他社会以开放心态接纳中国文化,却对外来节日在国内的正常传播保持警惕,甚至动辄上升到文化入侵的高度,这种态度难免存在双重标准。 文化交流应当是双向的。文化的跨国传播本身并不意味着文化支配,更不能简单地将文化消费等同于政治认同。年轻人参加万圣节活动,可能只是出于娱乐、社交和新鲜感,并不意味着他们放弃了中国传统文化。...

习近平面露不悦之色?法广(RFI)的报道很不严肃

法广的报道很不严肃:是“困惑”或者“诧异”,而不是“不悦”。 作者:毕研韬 | 发布时间:2026年11月3日 新闻报道不仅要准确传递事实,也应谨慎处理人物表情、情绪及其背后的态度判断。11月1日,法国国际广播电台(RFI)中文网一则有关德国总统施泰因迈尔访华的报道,却在这一点上出现了值得商榷的问题。 该则报道的标题是《施泰因迈尔:当被问及是否将就乌克兰问题举行中美俄峰会? 习近平面露不悦之色》。 问题在于,德语原词是Irritation。这个词通常表示困惑、诧异、意外或受到某种刺激后的不适,并不等同于中文的“不悦”。将其翻译为“面露不悦之色”,强化了对人物的负面情绪判断。 两者的区别并非无关紧要。“诧异”描述的是对意外信息的反应,“不悦”则暗含不满甚至恼怒。前者主要是对表情的描述,后者已经带有更明确的心理和态度判断。 尤其值得注意的是,报道涉及国家领导人之间的外交互动。人物表情本来就具有较强的解释空间,新闻翻译更应避免将模糊的情绪信号转化为确定的态度表达。 如果原文没有明确表达“不悦”,中文报道就不应替当事人作出这样的情绪判断。译为“习近平面露诧异之色”,或者更审慎地表述为“施泰因迈尔称,习近平对此似乎感到意外”,都比现有标题更加稳妥。 RFI是一家具有国际影响力的专业媒体。专业性不仅体现在信息来源和新闻事实的核实上,也体现在对语言分寸的把握上。涉及外交关系的报道,尤其需要区分事实、观察与解释。新闻翻译不能替原文增加情绪,更不能让一个词悄然改变读者对外交互动的理解。

孔子学院是国家安全威胁吗?警惕“信息瀑布”引发的风险

当一种安全判断在反复引用中逐渐成为共识,信息瀑布就可能放大认知偏差,并使人文交流陷入安全困境。 作者:毕研韬 | 发布时间:2026年10月28日 10月23日,美国国防部长赫格塞思宣布,美国国防部已将中国资助的美国高校孔子学院列为国家安全威胁。他声称,30所大学出现了80个使用不同名称、但执行相同任务的机构,并指称这些机构试图窃取知识产权、影响美国学生的思想。上述说法属于美方指控,仍需依据具体证据加以判断。 这一表态值得关注的不只是孔子学院的处境,还有一种可能扩散的认知风险:当一个机构被贴上国家安全威胁的标签后,这一判断可能如何影响更多机构、媒体和公众? 一、警惕“信息瀑布” 信息瀑布(Information Cascade)是指个体在观察到他人的判断或行为后,越来越依赖这些外部信号,而不再充分依据独立信息作出判断的现象。它可能导致某种观点迅速扩散,即使参与者并没有掌握充分、独立的证据。 在孔子学院问题上,如果政府官员首先提出安全指控,其他机构和媒体不断引用相关表态,大学又因政策压力而关闭相关机构,那么后续参与者可能把多方重复的判断以及机构关闭的事实,视为威胁确实存在的证据。 由此可能形成一个循环:安全疑虑引发政策限制,政策限制推动机构关闭,机构关闭又被当作安全疑虑的佐证。原本需要具体证据支持的判断,可能逐渐变成不言自明的共识。 这并不意味着美国对孔子学院的所有担忧都是错误的。资金透明度、学术自主和知识产权等问题,都可以接受调查和审查。真正需要警惕的是:不同主体表达相同判断,究竟源于独立调查,还是源于相互引用和对既有结论的依赖?...