Home 亚洲 Recommendations to the CPC Hainan Provincial Committee
亚洲

Recommendations to the CPC Hainan Provincial Committee

Share

By Bi Yantao

On December 18, 2025, the Hainan Free Trade Port (FTP) will officially commence customs closure operations. This marks a major milestone in China’s reform and opening-up process and serves as a symbolic manifestation of the country’s commitment to institutional innovation and openness. The progress of Hainan FTP is not only vital to the province’s future development but also a key window through which the international community observes China’s path toward openness and its logic of global governance.

At present, as the global geopolitical landscape undergoes rapid transformation and the world economy experiences structural reshaping, international perceptions of China’s institutional innovation have become a critical variable influencing the construction of the Hainan FTP. Therefore, Hainan’s development should go beyond political and economic dimensions to enhance the international acceptability of its institutions and practices, thereby consolidating a cognitive foundation for international cooperation and mutual benefit.

Current observations suggest that the Hainan decision-making system still needs to deepen its understanding of the international communication ecosystem. One of the main challenges in international communication about the Hainan FTP lies in addressing the complex issue of “Hainan as China’s Hainan.” Unless political correctness and technical correctness are effectively integrated, policy dividends may fail to translate into international recognition, thereby constraining the overall effectiveness of Hainan’s institution-based opening-up.

In light of the above, the following three recommendations are respectfully submitted for consideration by the provincial leadership.

I. Enhance Decision-Makers’ International Communication Literacy and Strategic Communication Awareness

The goal of international communication is to articulate development philosophies, policy intentions, and institutional advantages to the international community, thereby enhancing understanding, building trust, and fostering cooperation. As General Secretary Xi Jinping emphasized during the 31 May 2021 collective study session of the CPC Central Political Bureau, “It is necessary to strengthen the training of leading cadres in international communication.” This directive is both timely and crucial. Providing such training for provincial leaders is an essential step toward improving Hainan’s international communication capacity and represents a fundamental infrastructure requirement for international engagement.

Accordingly, it is recommended that the Provincial Party Committee organize systematic study sessions on international communication fundamentals. Through such learning, decision-makers can better understand international cognitive logics and integrate domestic development needs with international acceptability in policy formulation and implementation. This approach will help reduce external misperceptions, mitigate policy resistance, strengthen international trust, and expand cooperation opportunities. Moreover, a solid grasp of international communication principles will enhance leaders’ ability to identify capable talents, sound advice, and effective projects.

II. Establish an “International Advisory Committee on Hainan FTP Communication”

To strengthen Hainan’s capacity for global policy interpretation and institutional dialogue, it is recommended that the province establish an “International Advisory Committee on Hainan FTP Communication,” forming a high-level global think tank urgently needed by the province. Members should be selected worldwide based on their solid academic backgrounds in international communication and international relations, as well as their rich practical experience in international engagement. They should be capable of conveying China’s policy logic to global audiences with accuracy and clarity.

The committee would monitor and report trends in the international communication environment, identify key developments and potential risks affecting Hainan FTP, and propose corresponding interpretive and response strategies. It would assist Hainan in building a globally oriented institutional communication mechanism and cooperation network to ensure accurate understanding of the FTP’s policy rationale. The committee would also help Hainan prevent and mitigate major cognitive risks, thereby enhancing international recognition and the overall influence of its institution-based openness.

III. Improve the Identification and Selection of International Communication Talents

At present, there are two main groups engaged in China’s international communication: one that understands and respects the discipline’s inherent rules, and another that seeks to replace communication logic with thinking from other disciplines. Both operate under the banner of international communication, yet they exist as parallel worlds—occasional cooperation between them often occurs only when the latter seeks the former’s endorsement. The former tends to be modest and rigorous; the latter, more visible but less disciplined. Selecting the right kind of talent will be a great blessing for Hainan, while misjudgment in this regard may send unfavorable signals of “mismanagement in talent selection.”

It is therefore suggested that the Provincial Party Committee establish a comprehensive mechanism for identifying, training, utilizing, and evaluating international communication professionals, ensuring precision and efficiency in personnel selection and use. The ideal candidates should understand both China’s logic and international discourse, be capable of accurately translating policy meanings across cultural and linguistic contexts, and demonstrate both expertise in communication and commitment to Hainan’s FTP development. Building such a talent system will enable Hainan to maintain smooth and effective institutional dialogue with the world and secure the cognitive legitimacy essential for international cooperation.

Postscript

As a “New Hainaner” who has lived and worked in the province for 21 years, and as an international communication scholar with 35 years of professional experience, I deeply understand the strategic significance of the Hainan Free Trade Port to both the nation and the province. I fully support the strategic initiatives of the CPC Central Committee and the Hainan Provincial Government in advancing FTP construction and stand ready to contribute my expertise and insights to its international communication endeavors.

I have chosen to present these recommendations publicly, hoping to make use of a more transparent and controllable communication channel so that my suggestions can be fully shared with the public. I believe that ensuring smooth feedback channels and allowing professional opinions to reach decision-makers directly exemplify Hainan’s institutional innovation and governance modernization. In doing so, Hainan will also provide a compelling case of international communication in practice.

(The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the positions of any institution.)

Bi Yantao is a Professor at the School of International Communication and Art, Hainan University, and a Senior Fellow at the Charhar Institute.
Please follow and like us:
Related Articles

谢振中掌舵:香港新闻处的结构性转型

谢振中上任标志着香港新闻处由行政附属向专业化传播节点转型。 文:毕研韬  发布时间:2026年5月5日 一、一次看似常规的人事更替 2026年5月5日,谢振中正式出任香港特区政府新闻处处长。这一任命在程序上并不复杂:公开招聘、内部遴选、三年合约制,均符合近年来香港政府在人事安排上的制度化趋势。 从履历看,谢振中并非传统意义上的政务官。他早年任职于警队公共关系体系,在高强度舆论环境中积累了丰富的媒体应对经验;此后进入行政长官办公室,从事政策传讯工作,逐步进入政府传播核心层。其能力结构,更接近“危机沟通—议题管理—叙事整合”的复合型路径,而非传统行政管理序列。 如果仅从个体任命看,这是一种“跨系统选人”的专业化尝试。若将其置于更长的制度演进链条中观察,这一变化指向的并不仅仅是“谁来负责传播”,而是“传播在治理体系中的位置正在发生变化”。 二、历史惯例的松动:从政务官主导到专业岗位 长期以来,香港新闻处处长一职基本由政务官体系内部产生。这一安排的制度逻辑在于:新闻处被视为政府行政系统的一部分,其核心职责是政策发布与信息协调,而非独立的战略传播。 然而,此次由非政务官出任该职,意味着一个关键变化:新闻处的岗位属性,正在从“行政职位”向“专业职位”转化。这一变化至少体现在三个方面: 其一,人事来源多元化。打破单一官僚体系内部晋升路径,使传播岗位开始向具备实战经验的专业人员开放。 其二,任期机制灵活化。三年合约制弱化了传统公务员体系中的终身序列逻辑,使岗位更具绩效导向。...

在地缺席:美国对华认知失真的关键变量

当观察者缺席中国现实现场,信息越丰富,误判反而可能越系统化。 文/毕研韬  2026年5月3日发布 一、一次餐叙中的认知落差 一位老友自美国探亲归来,与我相约小聚。她在美国停留五个月,行程并不紧张,接触面较广。谈及所见所闻,她着重提到一个感受:一些美国社会群体——包括部分华人——对中国的认知,明显停留在过去。 她举了一个细节:某基督教群体对中国的了解,仍停留在改革开放初期的印象框架之中。 这一观察,与我近年来的判断形成了直接呼应。我在此前的文章中已指出,一些美国智库在对华研究中频繁出现“结构性误读”。在近日发表的分析文章中,我指出,China Media Project对中国的研究“缺乏内部视角”。这次对话,使这一判断获得了来自日常经验层面的印证。 问题随之变得具体:为什么在信息高度发达的今天,对中国的认知反而可能滞后? 二、问题的重心不在“信息不足” 直觉上,人们容易将这一现象归因于“信息不充分”,但这一解释并不成立。...

首届“中国百大公共知识分子”名单

2009年12月,《博讯新闻网》(Boxun News)发布了首届“中国百大公共知识分子”名单,引发部分华文网络舆论圈关注。 文/《无界传播》信息中心  2026年5月3日发布 《博讯新闻网》是一家服务器设在美国的中文网站,创建于2000年前后,创办人是孟维参(网名“韦石”,英文名Watson Meng)。《博讯网》采用公民记者模式,允许用户匿名投稿。 以下是《博讯新闻网》评选的“2009年中国百大公共知识分子”名单。 A-C:艾未未、艾晓明、北风、毕研韬、蔡楚、陈志武、陈行之、陈维健、长平、陈丹青、陈子明、陈彦、陈奎德、崔卫平 D-H:杜光、丁学良、戴晴、范亚峰、 冯崇义、傅国涌、巩胜利、高战、 高耀洁、胡泳、胡平、贺卫方、胡舒立、郝劲松、韩寒、何清涟 J-L:江平、刘洪波...

2026年1-4月中国新建12家国际传播机构,但高校层面几被境外忽视

2026年前四个月,中国密集成立12家国际传播机构,但境外研究仍聚焦地方传播节点,对高校体系的国际传播功能近乎无视。 文/毕研韬  2026年5月2日发布 一、体系扩展:多层级结构同步推进 2026年前四个月,中国在国际传播领域的制度建设明显提速。短时间内,新设机构覆盖高校与地方两个层级,呈现出“人才培养—知识生产—传播执行”同步推进的结构特征。总体来看,共有3家国际传播学院、2家国际传播研究院、7家地方国际传播中心相继成立,进一步夯实了多层级联动的组织体系。 从功能划分看,高校侧重能力建设与知识生产,地方层级则偏向传播执行与内容输出。这种分工构成当前中国国际传播体系的重要结构基础。 二、高校布局:学科化与专业化加速 在高校层面,2026年3月23日,复旦大学与新华社合作共建复旦—新华国际传播学院,体现出媒体与高校深度融合的趋势。3月30日,广西民族大学成立国际传播学院;4月25日,中国人民大学设立国际传播学院。这三所机构集中创建,表明国际传播已成为高校学科布局中的重点方向。 研究机构方面,2026年1月20日,温州大学成立“中国网络文学国际传播研究院”,将网络文学纳入国际传播研究范畴。4月18日,西南政法大学成立“习近平法治思想国际传播研究院”,显示出特定领域与国际传播结合的深化趋势。这类研究院更接近知识生产与话语建构,其功能与传统教学单位存在明显差异。 三、地方扩展:传播执行网络快速成形 相较于高校体系,地方层级的扩展更为密集。1月13日,长沙市天心区国际传播中心成立;2月12日,漳州市国际传播中心揭牌;2月24日,北部湾国际传播中心问世;3月26日,沈阳东北亚国际传播中心暨沈阳国际传播中心诞生;3月28日,徐州国际传播中心成立;4月10日,菏泽国际传播中心揭牌;4月20日,锡林郭勒国际传播中心成立。 短时间内7家机构落地,反映出地方在国际传播体系中的参与程度显著提升。这些中心通常承担内容生产、平台运营与对外叙事输出等功能,是当前体系中最具“执行属性”的节点。...