Home Blog An Initiative to Global Peace Scholars: Participating in Conflict Mediation and Building a Peaceful Future Together
Blog

An Initiative to Global Peace Scholars: Participating in Conflict Mediation and Building a Peaceful Future Together

Share

The Constitution of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) begins with the following statement:

“Since wars begin in the minds of men, it is in the minds of men that the defenses of peace must be constructed.”

This profound insight demonstrates that peace is not only a major issue in the fields of politics, security, and diplomacy, but also a critical subject concerning ideas, cognition, culture, and communication.

Today, the world is undergoing profound transformations. Regional wars and armed conflicts continue to emerge; cognitive divisions between different societies are deepening; and artificial intelligence is becoming deeply embedded in information communication, social cognition, and geopolitical competition. Global peace is facing unprecedented new challenges.

Against this background, peace studies need to further expand their boundaries. Peace scholars should not only serve as observers and researchers of peace issues, but also become participants and contributors to peace processes.

In light of this, I would like to propose the following initiative to peace scholars around the world:

I. Strengthen Exchanges on Peace Ideas and Build Cross-Civilizational Consensus on Peace

Peace is built first and foremost upon mutual understanding among human beings.

Peace scholars from different countries, civilizations, and academic traditions are encouraged to strengthen exchanges and explore, through sustained and in-depth intellectual dialogue, shared principles of peace recognized by humanity as a whole.

Such efforts can provide an intellectual foundation for reducing misunderstanding, lowering hostility, and fostering trust.

II. Actively Participate in Conflict Mediation and Transform Peace Research into Real-World Action

The value of peace research lies not only in explaining conflicts and wars, but also in exploring how to reduce conflicts, prevent wars, and promote reconciliation.

Peace scholars are encouraged to actively follow and participate in real-world international conflict mediation processes, and to engage in constructive dialogue with relevant governments, United Nations agencies, international organizations, regional institutions, civil society groups, and parties involved in conflicts.

Through participation in conflict mediation practices, scholars can summarize experiences, analyze mechanisms, and evaluate outcomes. These practical insights can then be transformed into new theoretical achievements, advancing peace studies from theoretical exploration toward practical innovation and promoting the development of an “action-oriented peace studies” paradigm.

III. Emphasize Effectiveness and Advance Peace Theories through Practice

Peace theories must be tested by reality.

The effectiveness of different concepts of peace, mediation approaches, and communication mechanisms should be evaluated through their practical outcomes.

Peace researchers should identify new challenges through action, refine theories through practice, and develop new knowledge of peace through accumulated experience.

Only through a productive interaction between theory and practice can peace research truly respond to the needs of our time.

IV. Establish a Global Mechanism for Exchange and Cooperation among Peace Scholars

Faced with an increasingly complex global conflict environment, peace research requires closer international cooperation.

I hope that international organizations, research institutions, and peace scholars will jointly promote the establishment of a global exchange and cooperation mechanism for peace scholars, providing a long-term platform for peace researchers to participate in international conflict mediation, strengthen transnational practical cooperation, and share experiences.

If this initiative moves forward, Communication Without Borders (CWB) would be willing to provide communication support and an exchange platform.

Peace is not only the responsibility of governments and international organizations; it is also an important mission of the global knowledge community.

In an era marked by rising risks of war, intensifying international competition, and the profound influence of artificial intelligence on global political communication, peace scholars shoulder an increasingly important historical responsibility.

Let us promote understanding through knowledge, advance peace through action, reduce conflicts through cooperation, and contribute our wisdom and efforts to the cause of human peace.

Initiator: Bi Yantao
Editor-in-Chief of Communication Without Borders (CWB);
Professor of Communication Studies, School of International Communication and Art, Hainan University

Email: bytaishan(at)sina.com
Website: www.borderlesscomm.com

July 26, 2026

Related Articles

一位中国急需的西藏国际传播专家

文|张小平 我初识毕研韬,是在2013年。 那年6月,西藏民族学院(现西藏民族大学)举办“首届西藏对外传播高端论坛”,我和毕研韬都受邀参会。他做了题为《技术正确是政治正确的保障——亟待调整的西藏文化对外传播战略》的大会发言。 他的发言让人耳目一新,展示了宽阔的国际视野和扎实的专业素养。 我干了一辈子西藏新闻,深知西藏的事情比较复杂。把自己的故事讲出去是一回事,别人愿不愿意听、能不能听明白,又是另外一回事。他提出的“政治正确与技术正确”关系问题,就是要解决这个难题。 那次见面以后,我和研韬有了更多交往。一个是长期在涉藏传播一线工作的老记者,一个是常年深耕国际传播的海归学者。我们谈西藏,也谈传播;谈国内,也谈国外。不知不觉间,我们成了亦师亦友的忘年交。 这些年下来,我对他的了解越来越多,也越来越相信,他是我国目前急需的西藏国际传播人才。 毕研韬与西藏的缘分,要从2002年说起。 那一年,他正在英国留学。11月的一天,他收到一封来自某国际涉藏组织的邮件,讨论中国西藏政策可能的走向,提出了与当时国际社会不同的预测。这封邮件引起了他的兴趣。从那以后,他开始关注西藏问题,着手研究国际社会怎样谈论西藏。 这一关注就是二十多年。 这些年里,他不是在书房里研究西藏。他去过西藏,也去过四川、青海、甘肃、云南等地的涉藏地区;到过印度、尼泊尔等地的藏人社区,也到美国、台湾等地了解相关情况。他曾与多位关键藏人做过深度交流。 这些经历,在我看来很重要。...

When Security Has No Limits, Everyone Pays

Whatever our jobs or social positions, most of us are struggling to...

当“安全逻辑”无限扩张,每个人都在付出代价

无论你从事什么工作,处于什么地位,人人都在生存拼搏,但似乎生活依旧不易,这究竟是为什么? 作者:毕研韬  发布:2026年9月1日 过去几十年,全球化建立在一个基本判断之上:国家之间可以通过贸易、投资、科技合作、人员往来和信息交流形成越来越紧密的联系。相互依赖虽然会产生风险,但总体上能够带来更高的效率、更大的市场和更多的合作机会。 今天,这一逻辑正在发生变化。 供应链、芯片、数据、传播、人工智能、关键基础设施、能源、金融、投资甚至科研合作,也越来越多地进入国家安全的视野。 安全正在变成一种越来越普遍的治理逻辑。 这并不意味着这些领域不存在真实风险。恰恰相反,全球化越深入,国家之间的相互依赖越复杂,确实越容易产生新的脆弱性。 问题在于:当越来越多的问题都被纳入安全框架之后,我们是否正在走向另一个极端——把原本可以通过市场、规则、合作和谈判解决的问题,也越来越多地交给安全逻辑处理? 如果这种趋势持续下去,全球化面临的最大风险,可能不再只是某一个具体领域的安全风险,而是安全化本身正在成为一种系统性风险。 一、安全意识增强,并不等于世界更加安全 安全化最初有其合理性。...

毕研韬教授受聘为海南自贸港周边传播研究中心研究员

作者:周明阳 发布:2026年8月25日 8月25日,海南自贸港周边传播研究中心在海口正式启动,海南大学国际传播与艺术学院毕研韬教授受聘为该中心特聘研究员。 海南自贸港周边传播研究中心由中国外文局亚太传播中心、北京大学周边传播研究中心、海南日报报业集团三方共建,依托海南日报报业集团新闻研究所、《南海传播》编辑部、海南国际传播中心开展日常运营。 中心将立足海南自贸港区位优势,深耕周边传播理论研究、实践创新和智库服务,为推动海南与周边国家和地区的交流合作提供智力支持。 周边传播是北京大学新闻传播学院陆地教授提出的本土原创传播学理论,狭义指国家边界两侧的双向信息活动,广义指各类主体与周遭对象的信息交互。周边传播秉持近似易通、周边优先、由近及远的逻辑,重视民间、民生、民俗传播,强调双向互惠,为周边外交与对外传播提供本土理论支持。