Home Blog The Mission of Communication Without Borders (CWB)
Blog

The Mission of Communication Without Borders (CWB)

Share

Promoting Understanding through Communication and Advancing World Peace through Cognitive Mediation

By Bi Yantao

Published on July 26,2026

The Constitution of UNESCO begins with the following declaration: “Since wars begin in the minds of men, it is in the minds of men that the defenses of peace must be constructed.”

By Bi Yantao

Published on July 26,2026

This profound insight reveals the intellectual roots of war and peace. Ultimately, wars often emerge from long-term accumulations of misunderstanding, alienation, and hostility between individuals, groups, and societies.

Therefore, maintaining peace requires not only political, security, and diplomatic mechanisms, but also the cultivation of foundations for peace in the realms of human thought, cognition, culture, and communication.

Communication plays a particularly important role in this process.

Communication is not merely a process of transmitting information; it is also a process of building relationships of understanding among people. Effective communication can reduce misunderstandings, overcome divisions, and foster trust, while an imbalanced communication environment may reinforce prejudice, solidify antagonism, and even intensify conflicts.

Based on this understanding, since its establishment, Communication Without Borders (CWB) has consistently focused on international communication, civilizational exchange, cognitive differences, and global peace issues. It is committed to exploring how communication can promote understanding, connect different societies, and create conditions for peacebuilding.

I.The Core Mission of Communication: Promoting Understanding Rather Than Merely Disseminating Information

In an era of rapid information flows, humanity’s challenge is no longer a lack of information, but a lack of understanding.

Different countries, civilizations, and social groups often possess different historical experiences, value systems, and perceptions of reality. The same event or piece of information may generate entirely different interpretations among different communities.

When such cognitive differences lack effective communication, they can easily develop into misunderstanding, distrust, hostility, and confrontation.

Therefore, the deeper mission of communication should not simply be to expand influence, but to promote mutual understanding among different actors.

A truly valuable communication practice should not only ask, “How can we make others hear us?” but also ask, “How can different people come to understand one another?”

This is precisely the public value that Communication Without Borders seeks to explore.

II. Cognitive Disembedding: A Communication Approach for Promoting Understanding

Many conflicts in modern society do not arise solely from irreconcilable interests; they also result from different actors being deeply embedded within their own cognitive frameworks.

Individuals, groups, and societies are often shaped by their historical memories, identities, cultural experiences, and information environments, forming relatively stable cognitive structures.

When different cognitive structures lack meaningful interaction, a situation may emerge in which people “only see themselves but fail to see others.”

In response to this challenge, Communication Without Borders has proposed the concept of “cognitive disembedding” as an approach to promoting understanding.

Cognitive disembedding does not require people to abandon their own positions or values. Rather, it encourages individuals and groups, while maintaining their own identities and judgments, to temporarily step outside their established cognitive frameworks and seek to understand others through a more open perspective.

This approach can help different actors recognize the limitations of their own perceptions, understand diverse social experiences, reduce simplistic judgments, and create possibilities for dialogue.

In this sense, cognitive disembedding is not only a method of cognitive mediation, but also an important pathway for peace communication.

III. From Communication Practice to Peace Practice

For a long time, peace studies have focused primarily on the causes of war, mechanisms of conflict, and theories of peace, while peace practice has largely been undertaken by governments, international organizations, and specialized institutions.

However, increasing experience has demonstrated that peace requires not only political negotiations and institutional arrangements, but also transformations in social cognition.

If conflicting parties cannot understand one another, even agreements that are reached may struggle to produce lasting peace.

Therefore, peacebuilding requires greater participation from knowledge communities. Peace scholars, communication researchers, and social practitioners should not only serve as observers and analysts of peace issues; they can also become participants in and facilitators of peace processes.

The practical logic of Communication Without Borders has emerged within this context.

Through intercultural dialogue, international communication research, and cognitive mediation practices, Communication Without Borders seeks to build bridges of understanding among different societies and contribute to reducing cognitive divides and promoting peaceful dialogue.

IV. The Mission of Communication Without Borders: Building a Platform for Understanding and Dialogue

Communication Without Borders is not simply an information-distribution platform; it is an open platform dedicated to fostering understanding.

Looking ahead, Communication Without Borders will continue to promote:

First, facilitating communication among different countries, civilizations, and societies in order to reduce misjudgments caused by a lack of understanding.

Second, exploring the role of communication in conflict prevention, peacebuilding, and international understanding.

Third, connecting global knowledge communities and providing a space for exchange among peace scholars, communication researchers, and practitioners.

Fourth, studying new transformations in communication brought about by artificial intelligence and exploring how to build a healthier, more open, and more rational global cognitive environment.

Conclusion: Making Communication a Force for Peace

If war originates in human thought, then peace can also gradually emerge through thought, understanding, and dialogue.

Communication connects people; understanding connects societies.

In an era marked by increasing cognitive fragmentation and growing international uncertainty, Communication Without Borders will continue to explore the peaceful value of communication: Promoting understanding through communication, reducing conflict through understanding, and advancing peace through cooperation.

This is the long-term mission of Communication Without Borders.

Author: Bi Yantao is the Editor-in-Chief of Communication Without Borders and a professor at the School of International Communication and Arts, Hainan University.

Related Articles

一位中国急需的西藏国际传播专家

文|张小平 我初识毕研韬,是在2013年。 那年6月,西藏民族学院(现西藏民族大学)举办“首届西藏对外传播高端论坛”,我和毕研韬都受邀参会。他做了题为《技术正确是政治正确的保障——亟待调整的西藏文化对外传播战略》的大会发言。 他的发言让人耳目一新,展示了宽阔的国际视野和扎实的专业素养。 我干了一辈子西藏新闻,深知西藏的事情比较复杂。把自己的故事讲出去是一回事,别人愿不愿意听、能不能听明白,又是另外一回事。他提出的“政治正确与技术正确”关系问题,就是要解决这个难题。 那次见面以后,我和研韬有了更多交往。一个是长期在涉藏传播一线工作的老记者,一个是常年深耕国际传播的海归学者。我们谈西藏,也谈传播;谈国内,也谈国外。不知不觉间,我们成了亦师亦友的忘年交。 这些年下来,我对他的了解越来越多,也越来越相信,他是我国目前急需的西藏国际传播人才。 毕研韬与西藏的缘分,要从2002年说起。 那一年,他正在英国留学。11月的一天,他收到一封来自某国际涉藏组织的邮件,讨论中国西藏政策可能的走向,提出了与当时国际社会不同的预测。这封邮件引起了他的兴趣。从那以后,他开始关注西藏问题,着手研究国际社会怎样谈论西藏。 这一关注就是二十多年。 这些年里,他不是在书房里研究西藏。他去过西藏,也去过四川、青海、甘肃、云南等地的涉藏地区;到过印度、尼泊尔等地的藏人社区,也到美国、台湾等地了解相关情况。他曾与多位关键藏人做过深度交流。 这些经历,在我看来很重要。...

When Security Has No Limits, Everyone Pays

Whatever our jobs or social positions, most of us are struggling to...

当“安全逻辑”无限扩张,每个人都在付出代价

无论你从事什么工作,处于什么地位,人人都在生存拼搏,但似乎生活依旧不易,这究竟是为什么? 作者:毕研韬  发布:2026年9月1日 过去几十年,全球化建立在一个基本判断之上:国家之间可以通过贸易、投资、科技合作、人员往来和信息交流形成越来越紧密的联系。相互依赖虽然会产生风险,但总体上能够带来更高的效率、更大的市场和更多的合作机会。 今天,这一逻辑正在发生变化。 供应链、芯片、数据、传播、人工智能、关键基础设施、能源、金融、投资甚至科研合作,也越来越多地进入国家安全的视野。 安全正在变成一种越来越普遍的治理逻辑。 这并不意味着这些领域不存在真实风险。恰恰相反,全球化越深入,国家之间的相互依赖越复杂,确实越容易产生新的脆弱性。 问题在于:当越来越多的问题都被纳入安全框架之后,我们是否正在走向另一个极端——把原本可以通过市场、规则、合作和谈判解决的问题,也越来越多地交给安全逻辑处理? 如果这种趋势持续下去,全球化面临的最大风险,可能不再只是某一个具体领域的安全风险,而是安全化本身正在成为一种系统性风险。 一、安全意识增强,并不等于世界更加安全 安全化最初有其合理性。...

毕研韬教授受聘为海南自贸港周边传播研究中心研究员

作者:周明阳 发布:2026年8月25日 8月25日,海南自贸港周边传播研究中心在海口正式启动,海南大学国际传播与艺术学院毕研韬教授受聘为该中心特聘研究员。 海南自贸港周边传播研究中心由中国外文局亚太传播中心、北京大学周边传播研究中心、海南日报报业集团三方共建,依托海南日报报业集团新闻研究所、《南海传播》编辑部、海南国际传播中心开展日常运营。 中心将立足海南自贸港区位优势,深耕周边传播理论研究、实践创新和智库服务,为推动海南与周边国家和地区的交流合作提供智力支持。 周边传播是北京大学新闻传播学院陆地教授提出的本土原创传播学理论,狭义指国家边界两侧的双向信息活动,广义指各类主体与周遭对象的信息交互。周边传播秉持近似易通、周边优先、由近及远的逻辑,重视民间、民生、民俗传播,强调双向互惠,为周边外交与对外传播提供本土理论支持。