Home 亚洲 China’s Whistleblower Doctor: Calls Grow for Justice
亚洲

China’s Whistleblower Doctor: Calls Grow for Justice

Dr. Lan Yuefeng
Share

Many Chinese internet users have spoken out in support of Lan Yuefeng, a doctor known as a whistleblower. They hope that this long-standing case can be revisited and that Dr. Lan’s reputation and employment-related benefits can be restored.

By Shi Gandang | October 23, 2026

Lan Yuefeng was formerly head of the Ultrasound Department at Mianyang People’s Hospital (绵阳市人民医院). She was an experienced clinician who adhered to professional medical standards. In 2009, she discovered that the hospital planned to perform a surgical procedure without a clear medical indication and immediately objected. She subsequently filed repeated real-name reports alleging excessive medical treatment, revenue-generating targets imposed on hospital departments, and irregularities in medical equipment procurement.

Following her reports, Lan faced what she regarded as workplace retaliation. The hospital removed her from her clinical position, assigned her to non-clinical study, and took away her office. Beginning in 2012, she spent years sitting in the hospital’s outpatient corridor in her white coat, seeking redress for her grievances. She came to be known as the “Corridor Doctor.”

In 2014, a local joint investigation team issued a statement saying that it had been unable to substantiate the allegations she had reported. Lan rejected the findings and maintained that her reports were truthful. That same year, the hospital terminated her employment contract following a vote by the staff congress, citing prolonged unauthorized absence from work. As a result, she lost her position and formal employment status, along with her salary and related retirement benefits.

In the years that followed, two successive heads of the hospital who had been implicated in her earlier reports were investigated and disciplined for disciplinary and legal violations. Meanwhile, Lan was left without a stable income and lived in considerable financial hardship in her later years. She has continued to pursue legal remedies and administrative appeals, refusing public donations. What she has sought, she says, is simply a fair and just resolution.

Today, growing numbers of internet users are voluntarily speaking out in her support. They are calling on the relevant authorities to review the case in light of new information and findings that have emerged since the original investigation.

Many believe that Lan paid a heavy price for having the courage to expose problems in the medical sector and should not have had to endure twelve years of hardship. They are calling for a fresh review and, if her allegations are substantiated, for the authorities to pay her outstanding wages and restore her professional title, formal employment status, and retirement benefits.

Those who have the courage to stand by their conscience should not be abandoned.

Related Articles

美国智库:美国应这样应对中国的信息影响

美国应将对华信息竞争纳入国家整体战略,统筹技术、产业、外交与信息治理,而非仅靠发布信息进行反驳。 作者:毕研韬 | 发布时间:2026年10月24日 美国大西洋理事会2024年7月发布报告《美国政府应对中国信息影响的有效策略》,认为美国应对中国信息影响活动的措施存在部门分散、概念界定不统一等问题。报告提出,美国需要制定一项全球信息战略,将信息政策与技术、产业、外交和数字基础设施统筹起来,而不能仅靠政府发布信息、反驳对手叙事。 这份报告的关注点,已经超出传统的国际传播竞争,延伸至信息生态、政府治理和全球数字规则。 一、美国认为,信息影响不是孤立的传播问题 报告由大西洋理事会数字取证研究实验室(DFRLab)发布,作者为该机构高级常驻研究员Kenton Thibaut。报告认为,中国的信息影响活动与经济、政治、产业和技术政策相互关联,不能仅通过分析新闻报道、社交媒体内容来理解。 报告特别指出,美国政府内部对“信息影响”的定义并不统一。有的部门将其理解为包括宣传、审查、数字治理和国际组织活动在内的广泛行动;有的部门则主要关注外国行为体在社交媒体上协调传播虚假信息的活动。 这种概念差异会影响政府部门如何识别问题、分配资源和采取行动。报告因此主张,将中国的信息活动放在更广泛的国际信息环境中考察,关注传播内容背后的技术基础设施、产业政策、国际规则和外交网络。 二、美国不应只靠发布信息反驳中国...

美联社:中国国家媒体用AI视频讽刺美国

当国家媒体采用社交媒体传播策略时,如何平衡流量与信誉? 作者:毕研韬 | 发布时间:2026年10月24日 美联社2026年4月10日刊发的一篇报道指出,中国国家媒体正在利用社交媒体、人工智能和娱乐化内容传播中国的政治叙事,并以美国及其总统为讽刺对象。报道列举了新华社和中国中央电视台近期发布的多个视频案例。 这些内容与传统的官方新闻报道和时政评论有所不同。它们不再主要依赖文字论述,而是借助动画、音乐、拟人化角色和故事情节传达政治立场。 一、官方媒体开始尝试新的表达方式 美联社列举了三个案例。 2026年2月,新华社发布了一段AI音乐视频,将美国描绘成一只身穿军装的白头鹰,以此讽刺美国试图控制格陵兰岛的意图。 3月,在特朗普召开“美洲之盾”峰会后,新华社又发布了一段短视频,将美国描绘成一只把其他小鸟关进笼子的白头鹰,并借其台词讽刺美国以安全为名扩大控制。 4月,中国中央电视台发布了一部约五分钟的AI武侠风格动画,以白头鹰象征美国,以波斯猫象征伊朗,通过戏剧化情节呈现伊朗战争。视频后来被X平台用户添加英文字幕并转发,美联社称其获得了超过100万次浏览。 这些案例表明,AI已经不只是新闻生产的技术工具,也开始被用于政治议题的视觉化表达和叙事创新。...

“吹哨医生”争议十二载,网民自发声援呼吁复核

在中国网络上,不少网民为“吹哨医生”兰越峰鸣不平,希望这件尘封多年的旧案能得到重新审视,恢复蓝医生的名誉和待遇。 作者:石敢当 | 发表时间:2026年10月23日 兰越峰,原是绵阳市人民医院超声科主任,临床业务扎实,行医恪守诊疗规范。2009年,她发现医院拟实施一项缺乏医学指征的手术,当即提出反对。之后,她持续实名举报院内过度医疗、科室下达创收指标、医疗设备采购不规范等问题。 为此她遭遇工作上的打压。医院将她调离临床岗位,安排待岗学习,办公场所也被收回。从2012年起,兰越峰常年身着白大褂,坐在医院门诊走廊,表达自己的诉求,被大家称作“走廊医生”。 2014年,当地联合调查组发布通报,表示未查实她举报的相关问题,兰越峰本人并不认可这份调查结论,始终坚持自己的举报属实。同年,医院以长期旷工为由,经职代会表决,解除了和她的聘用合同。自此,兰越峰失去岗位、编制,不再享有工资和退休相关待遇。 此后多年,当年她举报涉及的医院两任负责人,相继因违纪违法被查处,而兰越峰没有稳定收入,晚年生活清贫。这些年她一直依法申诉,拒绝社会捐款,只想要一个公正的说法。 如今大量网民自愿发声,呼吁相关部门结合后续查实的新情况,对当年事件重新复核。 大家认为,兰越峰当年敢于指出医疗行业弊病,代价巨大,不该承受十二年的困顿。网民希望,如复核后情况属实,应为兰越峰补发拖欠工资,恢复职称、编制与退休待遇,让敢于坚守良知的人,不被辜负!

朝鲜修改宪法,调整了权力合法性表述

朝鲜不会变天,但基于现实考量,此次修宪做了重大调整。 作者:毕研韬 | 发表时间:2026年10月22日 朝鲜2026年修宪调整了有关国家领导人、革命历史与国家治理的宪法表述。其重要性不只在于权力配置发生变化,还在于朝鲜如何通过宪法解释现行政治秩序的历史依据、制度依据与现实目标。 一、宪法做出哪些重大修改? 根据2026年5月公开披露的修订文本,朝鲜此次修宪涉及如下重大调整。 1.增加国家领土条款,删除部分统一表述 新宪法首次明确规定国家领土范围,指出朝鲜领土包括北接中国和俄罗斯、南接大韩民国的陆地,以及以此为基础划定的领海和领空。 与此同时,宪法删除了有关“和平统一”和“民族大团结”的部分表述。这与金正恩2023年底提出将朝韩关系界定为两个敌对国家之间关系的政策方向一致。 2.明确国家元首地位,调整最高领导人的权力配置 新宪法明确规定,国务委员会委员长是国家元首,并进一步规定其相关权力,包括高级官员任免权及对最高人民会议决定的否决权。与此同时,最高人民会议原有的罢免国务委员会委员长的规定被取消。...