Home Blog The Mission of Communication Without Borders (CWB)
Blog

The Mission of Communication Without Borders (CWB)

Share

Promoting Understanding through Communication and Advancing World Peace through Cognitive Mediation

By Bi Yantao

Published on July 26,2026

The Constitution of UNESCO begins with the following declaration: “Since wars begin in the minds of men, it is in the minds of men that the defenses of peace must be constructed.”

By Bi Yantao

Published on July 26,2026

This profound insight reveals the intellectual roots of war and peace. Ultimately, wars often emerge from long-term accumulations of misunderstanding, alienation, and hostility between individuals, groups, and societies.

Therefore, maintaining peace requires not only political, security, and diplomatic mechanisms, but also the cultivation of foundations for peace in the realms of human thought, cognition, culture, and communication.

Communication plays a particularly important role in this process.

Communication is not merely a process of transmitting information; it is also a process of building relationships of understanding among people. Effective communication can reduce misunderstandings, overcome divisions, and foster trust, while an imbalanced communication environment may reinforce prejudice, solidify antagonism, and even intensify conflicts.

Based on this understanding, since its establishment, Communication Without Borders (CWB) has consistently focused on international communication, civilizational exchange, cognitive differences, and global peace issues. It is committed to exploring how communication can promote understanding, connect different societies, and create conditions for peacebuilding.

I.The Core Mission of Communication: Promoting Understanding Rather Than Merely Disseminating Information

In an era of rapid information flows, humanity’s challenge is no longer a lack of information, but a lack of understanding.

Different countries, civilizations, and social groups often possess different historical experiences, value systems, and perceptions of reality. The same event or piece of information may generate entirely different interpretations among different communities.

When such cognitive differences lack effective communication, they can easily develop into misunderstanding, distrust, hostility, and confrontation.

Therefore, the deeper mission of communication should not simply be to expand influence, but to promote mutual understanding among different actors.

A truly valuable communication practice should not only ask, “How can we make others hear us?” but also ask, “How can different people come to understand one another?”

This is precisely the public value that Communication Without Borders seeks to explore.

II. Cognitive Disembedding: A Communication Approach for Promoting Understanding

Many conflicts in modern society do not arise solely from irreconcilable interests; they also result from different actors being deeply embedded within their own cognitive frameworks.

Individuals, groups, and societies are often shaped by their historical memories, identities, cultural experiences, and information environments, forming relatively stable cognitive structures.

When different cognitive structures lack meaningful interaction, a situation may emerge in which people “only see themselves but fail to see others.”

In response to this challenge, Communication Without Borders has proposed the concept of “cognitive disembedding” as an approach to promoting understanding.

Cognitive disembedding does not require people to abandon their own positions or values. Rather, it encourages individuals and groups, while maintaining their own identities and judgments, to temporarily step outside their established cognitive frameworks and seek to understand others through a more open perspective.

This approach can help different actors recognize the limitations of their own perceptions, understand diverse social experiences, reduce simplistic judgments, and create possibilities for dialogue.

In this sense, cognitive disembedding is not only a method of cognitive mediation, but also an important pathway for peace communication.

III. From Communication Practice to Peace Practice

For a long time, peace studies have focused primarily on the causes of war, mechanisms of conflict, and theories of peace, while peace practice has largely been undertaken by governments, international organizations, and specialized institutions.

However, increasing experience has demonstrated that peace requires not only political negotiations and institutional arrangements, but also transformations in social cognition.

If conflicting parties cannot understand one another, even agreements that are reached may struggle to produce lasting peace.

Therefore, peacebuilding requires greater participation from knowledge communities. Peace scholars, communication researchers, and social practitioners should not only serve as observers and analysts of peace issues; they can also become participants in and facilitators of peace processes.

The practical logic of Communication Without Borders has emerged within this context.

Through intercultural dialogue, international communication research, and cognitive mediation practices, Communication Without Borders seeks to build bridges of understanding among different societies and contribute to reducing cognitive divides and promoting peaceful dialogue.

IV. The Mission of Communication Without Borders: Building a Platform for Understanding and Dialogue

Communication Without Borders is not simply an information-distribution platform; it is an open platform dedicated to fostering understanding.

Looking ahead, Communication Without Borders will continue to promote:

First, facilitating communication among different countries, civilizations, and societies in order to reduce misjudgments caused by a lack of understanding.

Second, exploring the role of communication in conflict prevention, peacebuilding, and international understanding.

Third, connecting global knowledge communities and providing a space for exchange among peace scholars, communication researchers, and practitioners.

Fourth, studying new transformations in communication brought about by artificial intelligence and exploring how to build a healthier, more open, and more rational global cognitive environment.

Conclusion: Making Communication a Force for Peace

If war originates in human thought, then peace can also gradually emerge through thought, understanding, and dialogue.

Communication connects people; understanding connects societies.

In an era marked by increasing cognitive fragmentation and growing international uncertainty, Communication Without Borders will continue to explore the peaceful value of communication: Promoting understanding through communication, reducing conflict through understanding, and advancing peace through cooperation.

This is the long-term mission of Communication Without Borders.

Author: Bi Yantao is the Editor-in-Chief of Communication Without Borders and a professor at the School of International Communication and Arts, Hainan University.

Related Articles

毕研韬出席“国际传播能力建设理论与实践学术研讨会”

2026年10月16日-18日,《国际传播能力建设理论与实践学术研讨会——“中尼铁路和南亚交流”公众号创办四周年座谈会》在成都四川师范大学狮子山校区举行,来自中国与尼泊尔的约50位专家欢聚一堂,就国际传播相关议题展开深入交流。 作者:沈砚秋 | 发布时间:2026年10约18日 应四川师范大学华西边疆研究所所长孙勇教授邀请,海南大学国际传播与艺术学院毕研韬教授出席研讨会并发言。 毕教授以《国际传播安全化及其对策建议》为题做线上专题汇报。在介绍国际传播安全化概念及其危害之后,毕教授重点介绍了中国国际传播所面对的认知壁垒,并就策略优化提出个人建议。他的跨文明对话立场引起与会者热议。 “中尼铁路和南亚交流”公众号由孙勇教授团队创建,聚焦中国-尼泊尔关系和南亚话题组织跨学科国际对话,如今已成功运行四周年,取得了良好的社会反响。 尼泊尔加德满都政策研究室顾问、尼泊尔前驻华大使博迪亚尔(Leela Mani Paudyal),尼泊尔特里布文大学卡尔基(Mrigendra Bahadur Karki)教授、雷格米(Balmukunda...

中国大陆出版的《战略传播纲要》引发国际关注

今天,毕研韬教授更关心如何运用战略传播推动跨文明对话、减少误解、促进合作与和平。此一时,彼一时也。 作者:叶承安  发布时间:2026年10月1日 《战略传播纲要》由海南大学国际传播学者毕研韬和战略专家王金岭合作完成,于2011年9月由国家行政学院出版社和中央编译出版社联袂出版。全书26万字。 该书的出版引发包括台湾军方在内的国际战略界关注。 乌克兰国家图书馆(Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine)收藏了《战略传播纲要》,该馆图书目录完整记录了《战略传播纲要》信息,包括作者(毕研韬、王金岭,Бі Яньтао, Ван...

毕研韬出席“中国(海南)-东盟2026智库论坛”专题研讨会

2026年9月17日上午,中国(海南)-东盟2026智库论坛的重要活动之一——向海图强的形势与路径专题研讨会在海口举行。 作者:唐摩崖 发布时间:2026年9月17日 50位优秀论文作者应邀参加研讨会,其中20位作者围绕蓝色经济合作、海洋新质生产力培育、制度型开放等作交流发言。 海南大学国际传播与艺术学院毕研韬教授出席研讨会,并就中国-东盟经济合作的潜在风险与对策做了专题汇报,受到与会者认可与好评。这项研究是由毕教授与海南科技职业大学设计学院唐玥宸博士共同完成的。 本次论坛由海南省社会科学界联合会(海南省社会科学院)、中国南海研究院、华阳海洋研究中心联合主办。据悉,中国(海南)-东盟智库论坛已连续举办十届。

一位中国急需的西藏国际传播专家

文|张小平 我初识毕研韬,是在2013年。 那年6月,西藏民族学院(现西藏民族大学)举办“首届西藏对外传播高端论坛”,我和毕研韬都受邀参会。他做了题为《技术正确是政治正确的保障——亟待调整的西藏文化对外传播战略》的大会发言。 他的发言让人耳目一新,展示了宽阔的国际视野和扎实的专业素养。 我干了一辈子西藏新闻,深知西藏的事情比较复杂。把自己的故事讲出去是一回事,别人愿不愿意听、能不能听明白,又是另外一回事。他提出的“政治正确与技术正确”关系问题,就是要解决这个难题。 那次见面以后,我和研韬有了更多交往。一个是长期在涉藏传播一线工作的老记者,一个是常年深耕国际传播的海归学者。我们谈西藏,也谈传播;谈国内,也谈国外。不知不觉间,我们成了亦师亦友的忘年交。 这些年下来,我对他的了解越来越多,也越来越相信,他是我国目前急需的西藏国际传播人才。 毕研韬与西藏的缘分,要从2002年说起。 那一年,他正在英国留学。11月的一天,他收到一封来自某国际涉藏组织的邮件,讨论中国西藏政策可能的走向,提出了与当时国际社会不同的预测。这封邮件引起了他的兴趣。从那以后,他开始关注西藏问题,着手研究国际社会怎样谈论西藏。 这一关注就是二十多年。 这些年里,他不是在书房里研究西藏。他去过西藏,也去过四川、青海、甘肃、云南等地的涉藏地区;到过印度、尼泊尔等地的藏人社区,也到美国、台湾等地了解相关情况。他曾与多位关键藏人做过深度交流。 这些经历,在我看来很重要。...