Home 传播学 Decoding China Beyond Headlines
传播学

Decoding China Beyond Headlines

Share

By Bi Yantao

Published on June 19, 2026

For four decades, my academic and professional journey has been closely connected with international communication and cross-cultural understanding.

Over time, I have come to see myself, and many others engaged in China-related work, as boundary spanners—people who move between different worlds and try to build understanding across them. This includes China scholars, China watchers, international professionals based in China, journalists, business leaders, and diplomats.

Such a role is both meaningful and challenging. Those who try to explain one side to the other are sometimes misunderstood by both sides. In China, some people have viewed my perspectives as too close to Western ideas. Outside China, people may assume that I inevitably represent official viewpoints. Neither assumption reflects the complexity of reality.

Over the years, I have learned that genuine understanding requires intellectual independence, patience, and a willingness to tolerate ambiguity.

I: Why China Is Difficult to Understand

China is one of the most studied countries in the world, yet it remains one of the most misunderstood.

The problem is not a lack of information. News reports, policy documents, social media posts, academic papers, think tank analyses, and intelligence assessments are produced every day.

The challenge is that information and understanding are not the same thing.

Many observers rely heavily on headlines, expert commentary, polling data, or institutional reports. These sources are valuable, but they are not infallible. History offers many examples of experienced China scholars, respected research institutions, and government agencies misjudging developments in China.

At the same time, publicly available information within China does not always fully reflect social reality. Public communication often serves multiple purposes simultaneously: informing, explaining, promoting, persuading, and shaping perceptions.

No single source can explain China.

II: There Is More Than One China

International discussions often refer to China as if it were a unified actor with a single voice and a single perspective.

Reality is far more complex.

Different regions, generations, professions, and social groups frequently see the country through very different lenses. Intelligent and well-informed people can observe the same China and reach very different conclusions.

This is not always because one side is right and the other is wrong.

Often, they are looking at different parts of the same reality.

Perhaps the most important lesson I have learned is that there is no single China that everyone experiences.

III: Understanding China Through People

If information alone is insufficient, how can one better understand China?

My answer is simple: through people.

Some of the most valuable insights I have gained about China did not come from books, reports, conferences, or databases. They emerged from long conversations with friends, colleagues, students, and professionals from different backgrounds.

Many educated Chinese possess highly nuanced perspectives on their society. Yet such perspectives do not always appear in public discussions.

Meaningful understanding often develops through trust rather than observation alone.

Relationships do not replace information. They provide the context necessary to interpret it.

IV: A Final Reflection

After four decades in international communication, I have become increasingly cautious of simple explanations about China.

China cannot be understood solely through official narratives. Nor can it be understood solely through foreign interpretations. Headlines, expert analysis, and social media all offer valuable insights, but each provides only a partial view.

The greatest obstacle to understanding China is not the lack of information. It is the temptation to mistake a fragment for the whole.

For those who seek to understand China, I would offer a modest suggestion:

Remain curious. Remain skeptical. Remain open to complexity.

Most importantly, resist the urge to outsource your judgment to any single narrative.

China cannot be decoded through headlines alone. It must also be understood through experience, relationships, and the humility to recognize how much remains unseen.

The full version of this essay is coming later.
Bi Yantao is a professor at the School of International Communication and Art, Hainan University, and Editor-in-Chief of Communication Without Borders (CWB).

Related Articles

中国地方国际传播中心的一个重大贡献

地方国际传播中心的价值,不只在于让世界认识中国的地方,更在于通过地方文化的持续传播与积累,丰富了中国国家形象的社会文化基础。 作者:毕研韬 | 发布时间:2026年11月1日 2026年9月29日,英国卡迪夫大学(Cardiff University)学者Emma Martin在学术期刊 Global Media and China 发表论文《中国国际传播中心作为社交媒体上的软实力载体》(China’s...

国际传播正被置于国家安全框架中,动机何在?

当外国媒体、数字平台和跨境信息流动被纳入国家安全议程,背后不仅是风险防范,还涉及地缘政治竞争、技术优势和国际规则制定权。 作者:毕研韬 | 发布时间:2026年10月24日 近年来,国际传播与国家安全的联系日益紧密。跨境信息流动、外国媒体活动、数字平台、叙事竞争、人工智能生成内容乃至国际文化交流,都可能被纳入国家安全议程。这一变化可称为“国际传播安全化”。 国际传播安全化并不意味着所有传播活动都具有安全威胁,而是指国家或其他政治行为体将特定传播活动界定为安全问题,并据此推动相应的政策调整与治理措施。理解这一现象,不能停留在认知影响或信息操纵层面,还需要考察其背后的战略利益。 一、维护政治秩序与政权安全 国际传播具有跨境性,外部信息可以绕过传统传播渠道,进入一国国内的信息环境,并参与有关政治制度、公共政策和社会秩序的讨论。 当政府认为外部传播活动可能影响国内政治稳定、制度运行或执政合法性时,就可能将相关活动纳入国家安全框架。这种做法旨在降低外部行为体对国内政治进程施加影响的能力。 不过,维护政治秩序与维护政权安全并不完全相同。前者可能涉及社会稳定、公共秩序及政治制度的正常运行;后者则更直接地涉及执政地位与政治权力的延续。分析具体案例时,需要辨别两者的关系,不能将其简单等同于国家整体利益。 二、维护国家安全与战略自主 国际传播不仅涉及信息内容,还依赖数字平台、通信网络、数据系统和人工智能等技术基础设施。这些设施的控制权、运行规则及供应链结构,都可能影响国家的信息安全与战略自主。...

美国智库:美国应这样应对中国的信息影响

美国应将对华信息竞争纳入国家整体战略,统筹技术、产业、外交与信息治理,而非仅靠发布信息进行反驳。 作者:毕研韬 | 发布时间:2026年10月24日 美国大西洋理事会2024年7月发布报告《美国政府应对中国信息影响的有效策略》,认为美国应对中国信息影响活动的措施存在部门分散、概念界定不统一等问题。报告提出,美国需要制定一项全球信息战略,将信息政策与技术、产业、外交和数字基础设施统筹起来,而不能仅靠政府发布信息、反驳对手叙事。 这份报告的关注点,已经超出传统的国际传播竞争,延伸至信息生态、政府治理和全球数字规则。 一、美国认为,信息影响不是孤立的传播问题 报告由大西洋理事会数字取证研究实验室(DFRLab)发布,作者为该机构高级常驻研究员Kenton Thibaut。报告认为,中国的信息影响活动与经济、政治、产业和技术政策相互关联,不能仅通过分析新闻报道、社交媒体内容来理解。 报告特别指出,美国政府内部对“信息影响”的定义并不统一。有的部门将其理解为包括宣传、审查、数字治理和国际组织活动在内的广泛行动;有的部门则主要关注外国行为体在社交媒体上协调传播虚假信息的活动。 这种概念差异会影响政府部门如何识别问题、分配资源和采取行动。报告因此主张,将中国的信息活动放在更广泛的国际信息环境中考察,关注传播内容背后的技术基础设施、产业政策、国际规则和外交网络。 二、美国不应只靠发布信息反驳中国...

美联社:中国国家媒体用AI视频讽刺美国

当国家媒体采用社交媒体传播策略时,如何平衡流量与信誉? 作者:毕研韬 | 发布时间:2026年10月24日 美联社2026年4月10日刊发的一篇报道指出,中国国家媒体正在利用社交媒体、人工智能和娱乐化内容传播中国的政治叙事,并以美国及其总统为讽刺对象。报道列举了新华社和中国中央电视台近期发布的多个视频案例。 这些内容与传统的官方新闻报道和时政评论有所不同。它们不再主要依赖文字论述,而是借助动画、音乐、拟人化角色和故事情节传达政治立场。 一、官方媒体开始尝试新的表达方式 美联社列举了三个案例。 2026年2月,新华社发布了一段AI音乐视频,将美国描绘成一只身穿军装的白头鹰,以此讽刺美国试图控制格陵兰岛的意图。 3月,在特朗普召开“美洲之盾”峰会后,新华社又发布了一段短视频,将美国描绘成一只把其他小鸟关进笼子的白头鹰,并借其台词讽刺美国以安全为名扩大控制。 4月,中国中央电视台发布了一部约五分钟的AI武侠风格动画,以白头鹰象征美国,以波斯猫象征伊朗,通过戏剧化情节呈现伊朗战争。视频后来被X平台用户添加英文字幕并转发,美联社称其获得了超过100万次浏览。 这些案例表明,AI已经不只是新闻生产的技术工具,也开始被用于政治议题的视觉化表达和叙事创新。...