Home 传播学 Decoding China Beyond Headlines
传播学

Decoding China Beyond Headlines

Share

By Bi Yantao

Published on June 19, 2026

For four decades, my academic and professional journey has been closely connected with international communication and cross-cultural understanding.

Over time, I have come to see myself, and many others engaged in China-related work, as boundary spanners—people who move between different worlds and try to build understanding across them. This includes China scholars, China watchers, international professionals based in China, journalists, business leaders, and diplomats.

Such a role is both meaningful and challenging. Those who try to explain one side to the other are sometimes misunderstood by both sides. In China, some people have viewed my perspectives as too close to Western ideas. Outside China, people may assume that I inevitably represent official viewpoints. Neither assumption reflects the complexity of reality.

Over the years, I have learned that genuine understanding requires intellectual independence, patience, and a willingness to tolerate ambiguity.

I: Why China Is Difficult to Understand

China is one of the most studied countries in the world, yet it remains one of the most misunderstood.

The problem is not a lack of information. News reports, policy documents, social media posts, academic papers, think tank analyses, and intelligence assessments are produced every day.

The challenge is that information and understanding are not the same thing.

Many observers rely heavily on headlines, expert commentary, polling data, or institutional reports. These sources are valuable, but they are not infallible. History offers many examples of experienced China scholars, respected research institutions, and government agencies misjudging developments in China.

At the same time, publicly available information within China does not always fully reflect social reality. Public communication often serves multiple purposes simultaneously: informing, explaining, promoting, persuading, and shaping perceptions.

No single source can explain China.

II: There Is More Than One China

International discussions often refer to China as if it were a unified actor with a single voice and a single perspective.

Reality is far more complex.

Different regions, generations, professions, and social groups frequently see the country through very different lenses. Intelligent and well-informed people can observe the same China and reach very different conclusions.

This is not always because one side is right and the other is wrong.

Often, they are looking at different parts of the same reality.

Perhaps the most important lesson I have learned is that there is no single China that everyone experiences.

III: Understanding China Through People

If information alone is insufficient, how can one better understand China?

My answer is simple: through people.

Some of the most valuable insights I have gained about China did not come from books, reports, conferences, or databases. They emerged from long conversations with friends, colleagues, students, and professionals from different backgrounds.

Many educated Chinese possess highly nuanced perspectives on their society. Yet such perspectives do not always appear in public discussions.

Meaningful understanding often develops through trust rather than observation alone.

Relationships do not replace information. They provide the context necessary to interpret it.

IV: A Final Reflection

After four decades in international communication, I have become increasingly cautious of simple explanations about China.

China cannot be understood solely through official narratives. Nor can it be understood solely through foreign interpretations. Headlines, expert analysis, and social media all offer valuable insights, but each provides only a partial view.

The greatest obstacle to understanding China is not the lack of information. It is the temptation to mistake a fragment for the whole.

For those who seek to understand China, I would offer a modest suggestion:

Remain curious. Remain skeptical. Remain open to complexity.

Most importantly, resist the urge to outsource your judgment to any single narrative.

China cannot be decoded through headlines alone. It must also be understood through experience, relationships, and the humility to recognize how much remains unseen.

The full version of this essay is coming later.
Bi Yantao is a professor at the School of International Communication and Art, Hainan University, and Editor-in-Chief of Communication Without Borders (CWB).

Related Articles

国际传播:中国亟待跳出一个“陷阱”

中国应避免把政治正确等同于传播正确。 作者:毕研韬  发表时间:2026年8月2日 2013年6月,我在“首届西藏对外传播高端论坛”上做大会发言,题目是:“技术正确是政治正确的保障——亟待调整的西藏文化对外传播战略”。 当时提出这一观点,是基于一个简单但常被忽视的传播规律:任何传播目标,都必须通过符合传播规律的方法才能实现。政治目标可以决定传播方向,但不能替代传播规律。 13年过去了,这一判断依然适用于中国国际传播。 今天,中国比过去更加重视国际传播能力建设,然而,如果国际传播仍然主要沿用传统对外宣传逻辑,将国际传播理解为单向度的信息输出,将叙事竞争理解为舆论斗争,那么传播资源的增加是否一定能够转化为国际影响力? 答案并不确定。 中国国际传播亟待跳出一个“陷阱”:把政治正确等同于传播正确。 一、政治正确:国际传播不可回避的价值基础 国际传播不可能脱离政治。任何国家开展国际传播,都具有自身的战略目标、价值理念和利益诉求。美国传播民主价值,欧洲传播规则理念,中国传播自身发展经验和文化理念,本质上都包含政治和价值因素。 因此,政治正确具有必要性。它回答的是:为什么传播?传播什么?...

FBI搜查一家华裔媒体,这对中国意味着什么?

一个传播平台越靠近某个国家的文化和政治资源,就越需要证明自身的独立性、透明度和公共价值。 作者:毕研韬 发表时间:2026年8月2日 近日,美国联邦调查局(FBI)对南加州多个地点展开搜查行动,其中涉及鹰龙传媒(EDI Media)创办人苏彦韬(James Su)的住所和办公地点。 此次行动涉及“外国影响力”调查方向,但截至目前,美国司法部门尚未公布针对鹰龙传媒或其负责人的正式指控。 所谓“华裔媒体”,可以理解为是“华裔社区媒体”的简称,强调服务于华人社区。 鹰龙传媒为何进入FBI视野?美国究竟关心什么? 近年来,在大国竞争背景下,媒体、文化交流平台和社会组织,正在越来越多地被纳入“外国影响力”讨论范围,成为美国政府密切关注的对象。 一、鹰龙传媒是一家怎样的华裔媒体? 鹰龙传媒成立于1993年,总部位于美国加州,是一家面向华人社区的综合性多媒体公司。...

敦煌外籍主播事件:对各省国际传播中心的警示

近日,敦煌市融媒体中心拟聘用美籍主播古爱华(Edward Kuperman)事件引发舆论热议。表面上这是地方媒体的人员聘用争议,但随着境外媒体报道和国内舆论讨论深入,其影响已超越地方层面,成为观察地方国际传播建设和开放治理能力的案例。 新加坡《联合早报》7月25日报道称,古爱华“遭中国网民网暴”,并提及部分网民提出“反华”“间谍”质疑;台湾“中央社”7月28日报道称,部分网民质疑古爱华背景,并批评官方传播阵地“竟用公款资助具反华背景的人士”;香港英文媒体《The Standard》报道称,一些网民指控古爱华为外国间谍;香港《明报》文章说,“部分网民质疑他‘反华’,是美国向中国渗透的‘间谍’”。 据报道,古爱华已经放弃聘任资格。目前,敦煌市委宣传部已成立调查组。 从事件影响看,此事已经不宜仅作为地方招聘事件处理。由于涉及地方国际传播实践、公共资源使用、国际舆论环境、国家安全风险、中国对外开放形象,建议从更高层级开展调查评估,总结经验教训。 一、地方国际传播中心进入快速发展期 近年来,各地纷纷建设地方国际传播中心,探索通过城市形象传播、文化交流、旅游传播和融媒体平台向国际社会讲述地方故事。这一趋势具有积极意义。 但是,地方国际传播中心的大规模建设,也带来了新的治理挑战。 一些地方在快速推进过程中,存在建设速度快于制度建设、传播需求快于专业能力提升的问题。 如果缺乏系统设计,就容易出现“重形式、轻机制”“重传播、轻治理”的问题。 二、敦煌事件提醒:国际传播建设需要制度先行...

敦煌需要外国主播吗?这场争论该如何收场?

国际传播需要的不只是“外国面孔”,更是能够完成文化转译、建立认知连接并获得长期信任的传播能力。 作者:毕研韬  发表时间:2026年7月29日 近日,敦煌市拟聘用美国青年古爱华(Edward Kuperman)担任融媒体主播,引发网络热议。 支持者认为,国际传播需要突破文化边界,外国传播者熟悉海外受众的语言习惯和思维方式,有助于中国文化实现更有效的跨文化传播。质疑者则提出,敦煌文化博大精深,一个并非敦煌学专家的外国青年,是否具备讲述敦煌的权威性?一个经济相对欠发达地区投入资源聘请外国主播,是否符合公共资源使用逻辑?相关程序是否规范?此外,其个人经历也引发了安全方面的讨论。 这场争论触及中国国际传播发展中的一个核心问题: 国际传播究竟需要什么样的传播者?外国身份能够带来多少传播优势?又有哪些局限? 一、敦煌国际传播:从“知名度”走向“理解力” 敦煌具有天然的国际传播价值。 作为丝绸之路上的重要文化遗产,敦煌本身就是东西方文明交流的重要象征,但它并不是一个缺少国际知名度的普通地方文化资源。 因此,敦煌国际传播面临的真正挑战,并不是简单回答:“世界知道敦煌吗?”而是“世界理解敦煌吗?”...