Home 亚洲 A Letter Sent to WTO Director-General on US-China Tariff Issues
亚洲北美

A Letter Sent to WTO Director-General on US-China Tariff Issues

Share
Editor’s Note: On April 23, 2025, as Editor-in-Chief of Communication Without Borders (CWB), Professor Bi Yantao sent a letter to WTO Director-General Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala. The letter proposes that the WTO discreetly facilitate informal, rules-based contact between China and the United States as a means of easing escalating tariff tensions and reopening channels of dialogue without political pressure. The full text of the letter is as follows. 

To: Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala
Director-General
World Trade Organization (WTO)
Rue de Lausanne 154
CH-1211 Geneva 2
Switzerland

Dear Dr. Okonjo-Iweala,

Subject: A Proposal for WTO-Led Facilitation of Informal Contact Between China and the United States on Tariff Issues

I hope this letter finds you well.

As a communication scholar and observer of international strategic narratives, I am writing to respectfully suggest that the World Trade Organization consider facilitating a new form of dialogue—discreet, informal, and rules-based—between China and the United States in response to their ongoing and escalating tariff standoff.

Since 2025, the tariff confrontation between the two largest economies has reached unprecedented levels, with average U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods reportedly approaching 145%, and reciprocal measures from China affecting nearly all American exports. While the situation has evolved beyond a mere trade dispute into a deeper systemic rivalry, I believe the WTO remains uniquely positioned to provide a neutral, rules-oriented environment for re-engagement.

I am not suggesting formal negotiations or any high-level summit that may carry political sensitivities. Rather, I envision a WTO-facilitated platform for asymmetric contact—quiet, unofficial interactions held on the sidelines of technical meetings, mini-ministerials, or thematic workshops. Such contact can help reduce misperceptions, de-escalate tensions, and eventually lay the foundation for substantive exchanges without requiring either party to publicly appear to concede ground.

The WTO’s legitimacy, multilateral credibility, and technical capacity make it the most suitable actor to host such engagements, especially under the framing of shared responsibility for maintaining global trade stability. In this regard, informal consultations or roundtables on topics such as “tariff spillover effects on global inflation” or “trade policy coherence amid geopolitical shifts” may offer productive starting points.

Your leadership in navigating WTO through difficult times has been inspirational, and I trust your judgment in recognizing the diplomatic opportunities that multilateralism still affords. I would be honored to further elaborate on this idea, if desired, and I hope this proposal will contribute to ongoing efforts toward global economic stability and peace.

With my highest respect,

Prof. Bi Yantao  

Editor-in-chief
Communication Without Borders (CWB)
www.borderlesscomm.com

The illustration was generated by Grok, with thanks.

Related Articles

Who Decides Taiwan’s Future? — The Real Clash Between Two Logics

The debate over Taiwan’s future appears, on the surface, to concern “who...

谁能决定台湾的未来?——两种逻辑的真实冲突

围绕台湾未来的争论,表面是在讨论“谁来决定”,本质是在争谁有资格定义规则。两种叙事各自成立,但最终影响力取决于现实力量与情境变化。 文/毕研韬  2026年5月26日发布 一、这个问题其实在问两件完全不同的事 “谁能决定台湾的未来”,表面上这是一个政治问题,但实际上至少有两种完全不同的回答方式。 一种说法是:台湾的未来应该由台湾社会自己决定。 另一种说法是:台湾问题涉及国家统一,最终应由包括台湾同胞在内的全体中国人共同决定。 这两种说法看起来都在讲“人民”,但关键差别在于谁被算作“人民”,以及谁有资格做最终裁判。 二、民进党/台北叙事:强调“岛内决定” 以台湾现行执政力量的叙事为例,核心逻辑很简单: 台湾是一个已经形成稳定政治体系的社会,因此未来由岛内选举、民意和制度来决定。 在这个逻辑里,谁执政由选票决定,政策走向由岛内政治竞争决定,外部力量只能影响,但不能“决定”。...

Awakening of the Masses: China Is Undergoing a New Great Leap in Social Cognition

If you still think the word “awakening” sounds pretentious or mystical, that...

全民觉醒:中国正在经历社会认知大跃迁

如果你还觉得“觉醒”这个词太矫情、太玄乎,那可能恰恰说明你还没醒。 文/毕研韬  2026年5月24日更新 2026年,从社交媒体到职场茶水间,从家庭群聊到深夜酒局,一场覆盖数亿人的认知地震正在发生。它不是官方文件里写的“精神文明建设”,不是鸡汤博主喊的“做更好的自己”,而是一场从骨子里外溢的、系统性的、不可逆的社会认知大跃迁。 这场跃迁没有总指挥,没有路线图,但它同时发生在六个核心维度上。 一、长出反骨:你没有资格教育我该做什么 什么叫规训?就是从小到大,有无数人告诉你——你应该做什么、不应该做什么;什么是对的、什么是错的;什么叫成功、什么叫失败。 父母说:你应该听话。老师说:你要好好学习。老板说:你应该有狼性。社会说:你应该三十岁前结婚。专家说:你应该延迟满足、应该多生孩子。 以前,这些话是金科玉律。现在,年轻人只回一个字:滚。 这不是叛逆,是祛魅。他们开始问一个最朴素的问题:你凭什么教育我? “人生不是轨道,是旷野。”这句话被说烂了,但真正理解它的人,是那些已经跳出轨道、正在旷野里摔跤的人。 最典型的规训反抗发生在“人生时间表”上。三十岁没结婚?以前叫“剩男剩女”,现在叫“我的事你少管”。不生孩子?以前叫“不孝有三”,现在叫“生了你养?”不买房?以前叫“没出息”,现在叫“不想背三十年债”。...